CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 14 No. 8 6
 

Benefit of FOLFOX4 Confirmed at 4-Year Follow-up of MOSAIC Trial

August 1, 2005

PARIS, FRANCE-Analysis of disease-free survival data at 4 years into the MOSAIC trial "amplifies the benefit of FOLFOX4 obtained at 3 years," reported the trial's lead investigator, Aimery de Gramont, MD, of Hôpital Saint Antoine in Paris (abstract 3501). The MOSAIC (Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin(Drug information on oxaliplatin)/FU-LV in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer) trial was designed to demonstrate an increase in disease-free sur- vival in stage II and III colon cancer. At a median follow-up of 56.2 months, the disease-free survival rate was 69.8% in patients receiving fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil)/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) and 76.4% in patients receiving FOLFOX4 (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin [Eloxatin]). This 6.6% difference (P > .001; hazard ratio [HR] = .77) in diseasefree survival between the two arms of the study translates into a 23% reduction in the risk of relapse, Dr. de Gramont said. Clearer Benefit in Stage III Disease For patients with stage II disease (40% of both arms), the difference in disease-free survival was 3.5%, and for patients with stage III disease (60%), the difference was 8.6%, favoring the FOLFOX4 arm. "The majority of the benefit is clearer in stage III, but we see a difference in stage II. I don't think this is either an endorsement or indictment for using this regimen in stage II," noted Leonard B. Saltz, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, a discussant for this ASCO presentation. "Patients who are higher risk stage II clearly have a prognosis appropriate to be considered along with the best therapies for stage III. For the lower risk stage II patients, I think toxicity issues have to be considered," Dr. Saltz added. In patients with stage III disease and fewer than four positive nodes, the difference in survival was 7.2%; in patients with more than four positive nodes, "the difference was an impressive 11.5%," Dr. de Gramont said. "This study has met elegantly its primary objective and this is why FOLFOX has been registered to treat patients with stage III colon cancer," he concluded. Data were reported for 1,123 patients in each of the study arms. Overall survival at 4 years was 82.8% in the 5-FU/LV arm and 84.9% in the FOLFOX4 arm. Notably, there were fewer patients alive with recurrence in the FOLFOX4 arm than in the 5-FU/LV arm (83 patients [7.4%] vs 134 patients [11.9%]). "With the difference in patients alive with recurrence, there is no doubt that the final difference in survival will be significant," Dr. de Gramont said. The relapse rate was 24.8% in the FOLFOX4 study arm and 30.7% in the 5-FU/LV arm. Long-term Safety Grade 3/4 neutropenia was much more common among patients receiving oxaliplatin, occurring in 41% of those in the FOLFOX4 arm and 4.7% of those in the 5-FU/LV arm (see Table 1). Febrile neutropenia was uncommon in both arms, affecting 1.8% of the FOLFOX4 arm and 0.2% of the 5-FU/LV arm. "GI toxicity was mild, and that is a good reason to keep the FOLFOX4 regimen in the next adjuvant studies," Dr. de Gramont said. Neuropathy occurred among 12.4% of patients in the FOLFOX4 arm but was completely resolved in 80% of patients and at least partially resolved in almost all patients. Long-term safety was demonstrated by no significant increase in second cancers.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

Xeloda Receives Approval as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer
NUTLEY, New Jersey-The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved Xeloda (capecitabine, Roche) for the adjuvant treatment of patients with Dukes' C colon cancer. Approval was based on data from the Xeloda in Adjuvant Colon Cancer Therapy (X-ACT) trial reported at ASCO (abstract 3521), which showed that Xeloda met its primary endpoint of noninferiority to fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) for disease-free survival (see full report on page 5). Neither Xeloda alone nor combination chemotherapy has shown the ability to prolong overall survival in Dukes' C patients, but combination chemotherapy prolongs diseasefree survival, compared with 5-FU/ LV, and the new labeling advised physicians to consider these results when prescribing single-agent Xeloda in Dukes' C patients. Xeloda was first approved in 1998 for treating metastatic breast cancer and granted a new indication in 2001 for use in metastatic colorectal cancer. The newest indication for adjuvant use in Dukes' C colon cancer follows FDA review of data from the multicenter, randomized, controlled phase III X-ACT study in 1,987 patients.





 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy