CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 14 No. 8 6
Less neutropenia, more hand-foot syndrome 

XELOX Compares Favorably With FOLFOX4 in Adjuvant Therapy for Colorectal Cancer

August 1, 2005

ORLANDO-In first-line metastatic colorectal cancer, capecitabine(Drug information on capecitabine) (Xeloda) is better tolerated than fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil)/ leucovorin (5-FU/LV), and the addition of capecitabine to oxaliplatin(Drug information on oxaliplatin) (Eloxatin)(XELOX) is both effective and tolerated, Hans-Joachim Schmoll, MD, PhD, said (abstract 3523). Dr. Schmoll reported early safety findings from a phase III trial of XELOX vs bolus 5-FU/LV as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III colon cancer. "In the MOSAIC trial, oxaliplatin + 5-FU/LV (FOLFOX4) resulted in superior disease-free survival compared with 5-FU/LV and has recently been approved for adjuvant therapy. As in metastatic colorectal cancer, capecitabine should be considered as an alternative to 5-FU/LV in combination with oxaliplatin in the adjuvant setting. Therefore, we compared the safety and efficacy of XELOX with those of bolus 5-FU/LV (the standard regimen at the start of the study) as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer," Dr. Schmoll said. This ongoing study enrolled 1,886 patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Patients were randomized to receive XELOX (capecitabine: 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 + oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or IV bolus 5- FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen: LV-20 mg/m2 + 5-FU-425 mg/m2 on days 1- 5, every 4 weeks for six cycles; or Roswell Park regimen: LV-500 mg/m2 + 5-FU-500 mg/m2 on day 1, for weeks 1-6 in four 8-week cycles). Reduced Rate of Febrile Neutropenia A total of 1,719 patients were evaluable for safety. "There was a similar rate of related adverse events with XELOX and 5-FU/LV. There was less grade 3/4 stomatitis (1% vs 8%), neutropenia (8% vs 15%), and febrile neutropenia (< 1% vs 4%) with XELOX than with 5-FU/LV. There was more frequent grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (5% vs 1%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (5% vs 1%) with XELOX than with 5-FU/LV. Fifty-four percent of XELOX patients and 45% of 5-FU/LV patients experienced treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events. Sixty-day all-cause mortality was 1% on both arms," Dr. Schmoll said. "The lower rate of neutropenia with XELOX led to a reduced rate of grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia," Dr. Schmoll said. Dr. Schmoll and investigators concluded that the safety data from this trial indicate that XELOX is feasible in adjuvant treatment of colon cancer and compares favorably with FOLFOX4. "XELOX appears to cause less myelosuppression and stomatitis but more skin and neurosensory toxicities than 5-FU/LV. XELOX has now been incorporated in the three-arm AVANT adjuvant trial (FOLFOX4 vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab [Avastin] vs XELOX + bevacizumab)," Dr. Schmoll said. Efficacy results are expected in 2007.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy