CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 14 No. 8 6
A predictable and manageable safety profile 

XELOX Is Active in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

August 1, 2005

NAPLES, ITALY-As firstline therapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, XELOX (capecitabine [Xeloda] and oxaliplatin(Drug information on oxaliplatin) (Eloxatin]) achieved an objective tumor response rate of 41% (abstract 3582). Final results of a phase II multicenter trial conducted by the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group, National Tumour Institute in Naples, also showed progression-free survival of 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7-10.3) and overall survival of 14.4 months (95% CI: 11.9-16.9). "Ongoing phase III trials evaluating XELOX vs FOLFOX (fluorouracil [5-FU], leucovorin, oxaliplatin) with or without bevacizumab(Drug information on bevacizumab) (Avastin) are expected to confirm that capecitabine(Drug information on capecitabine) should replace 5-FU/leucovorin as the backbone of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy," the investigators concluded. Protocol Amended Safety and efficacy were assessed in 76 patients ≥ 70 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2, and life expectancy ≤ 3 months. Two XELOX regimens were assessed. The 35 patients in series 1 received 1,000 mg/m2 of oral capecitabine twice daily on days 1 to 14 and 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1. In the absence of grade 2 or higher hematologic toxicity, the dose of oxaliplatin was increased to 100 mg/ m2 in cycle 2, and in the absence of grade 2 or higher nonhematologic toxicity in cycle 2, the dose of capecitabine was increased to 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily in the third and subsequent cycles. Once 35 patients were treated in that series, the protocol was amended for the next 45 patients: The dose of oxaliplatin was increased, first to 110 mg/m2 and then to 130 mg/m2. After 451 cycles of treatment, with a median of 6 cycles per patient, the overall response rate was 41% (95% CI, 30%-53%). No differences in activity were observed between the first and second series (Table 1). The disease control rate, which includes partial and complete responses plus stable disease, was 74%. Good Safety Profile The investigators reported that XELOX had a predictable and manageable safety profile in the elderly, with predominantly mild to moderate adverse events. The second series of XELOX administration, which had higher levels of oxaliplatin but kept capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m2, produced more hematologic adverse events. They included grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, which did not occur in the first series. There were no treatment-related deaths. "XELOX also offers benefit to the patient in terms of convenience, reduced discomfort, and avoidance of central venous access vs infusional 5-FU/leucovorin regimens," the investigators concluded. "These benefits are particularly important in elderly patients, who may have more difficulty in traveling to/from the oncology clinic."

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy