CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 14 No. 1 1
 

Cetuximab Improves Efficacy of Cisplatin/Vinorelbine in EGFR-Positive NSCLC Patients

January 2, 2005

BARCELONA-Adding cetuximab(Drug information on cetuximab) (Erbitux) improves the efficacy of cisplatin(Drug information on cisplatin)/vinorelbine (Navelbine) for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients whose tumors express epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR), according to Rafael Rosell, MD, of the Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain. Dr. Rosell reported that data from a randomized phase II study also showed that development of a skin rash is predictive of response and that the toxicity of the regimen was not increased substantially by adding cetuximab (abstract 7012). Cetuximab is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR. Dr. Rosell said that combinations of cetuximab and chemotherapy have been shown to be effective and safe in other EGFR-expressing tumors such as colorectal and head and neck cancers. Predominantly Stage IV The primary study endpoint was objective response rate. Ninety percent of the patients in this study had stage IV disease. All patients were treated with three cycles of cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Patients were then randomized to receive either additional treatment with cetuximab 400 mg/m2 on week 1 and 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter (arm A, n = 43), or no additional treatment (arm B, n = 43). Ninety percent (101 of 122 patients screened) had EGFR expressing tumors. A total of 86 patients were enrolled, 43 in each of the two treatment arms. One-year survival was 32% with cetuximab plus chemotherapy vs 29% with placebo plus chemotherapy, but Dr. Rosell emphasized that only five patients are still alive. Survival at 18 months was 14% with cetuximab vs 0 on the comparison arm. "The longest survival was 24 months," he said. The patients who were treated with cetuximab had more grade 3 or 4 asthenia and fatigue (19% vs 2%). Complete/Partial Responses For patients under age 60 years, the unconfirmed complete response/partial response rate was 63% for patients treated with cetuximab vs 2% for controls. In the same population, confirmed complete/partial responses were 14% with cetuximab, 0 without cetuximab. For patients over age 60 years, the unconfirmed complete response/partial response rate was 31% with cetuximab vs 36% without cetuximab. Dr. Rosell said that the response rate was 25% in patients who developed any type of skin toxicity. "Cetuximab can safely be added to the regimen of cisplatin and vinorelbine, with evidence suggesting enhancement of activity," Dr. Rosell concluded.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors
Updates in Targeted Therapy for
Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors


 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Bladder Cancer Recurrence High, Better Follow-Up Care Needed
  • ASCO: Post-Surgery Surveillance Found Safe in Seminoma
  • Fertility Preservation in Women With Breast Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities
  • Addressing Fertility Concerns in Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer: Will Serial Reserve Screening Help?
  • Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy