CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 14 No. 8 6
High rate of R0 resections achieved 

XELOX-RT Is Practical Regimen for Borderline Resectable Rectal Cancer

August 1, 2005

ORLANDO-Neoadjuvant capecitabine(Drug information on capecitabine) (Xeloda), oxaliplatin(Drug information on oxaliplatin) (Eloxatin), and preoperative pelvic radiotherapy (XELOX-RT) is a welltolerated regimen in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and produces high rates of curative resection, according to Robert Glynne-Jones, MBBS (Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK). Dr. Glynne-Jones reported data from the SOCRATES phase II study of this regimen in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (abstract 3527). "This is a practical and convenient regimen. Capecitabine simplifies the delivery of chemoradiation, reducing problems associated with radiotherapy scheduling during chemotherapy. XELOX-RT reduces the burden on patients and staff compared with using intravenous chemotherapy during chemoradiation," Dr. Glynne- Jones said. Combined Phase I and II Data Patients with primary unresectable locally advanced rectal cancer received capecitabine (500, 650, 825 mg/m2 twice daily) 7 days/week during RT, oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), and synchronous preoperative RT (25 fractions of 1.8 Gy, 45 Gy total) over 25 days. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine was 650 mg/m2 twice daily, and this dose was used in the phase II part of the study. Pathologic Complete Response Rate of 19% This analysis combined data from the phase I and phase II components of the SOCRATES study. It included 18 patients from the phase I dose escalation study and 78 patients treated at the recommended phase II dose. Of 96 patients enrolled, 95 received treatment with XELOX-RT, and 85 underwent a potentially curative resection. Of the patients undergoing surgery, 75 patients (88%) had an R0 and 8 patients (9%) had an R1 resection. Of the 83 resected specimens, 16 (19%) showed a p Regimen Is Well Tolerated "This analysis confirms that the recommended XELOX-RT regimen is feasible with RT. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were diarrhea (66%), transient paresthesias (56%), and nausea (51%)," Dr. Glynne-Jones said. Only 21 of the 95 patients (22%) had grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The most common grade 3 or 4 side effects were gastrointestinal disturbances (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, pain), lethargy, and dehydration. Only three patients had hand-foot syndrome, all grade 1. Dr. Glynne-Jones concluded that, "XELOX-RT is highly effective for the neoadjuvant treatment of borderline unresectable rectal cancer. To date, 85 patients (90%) have undergone surgery, and 75 (88%) have had a histologically confirmed R0 resection. XELOX- RT achieved a pathologic complete response rate of 19% and enabled a high level of R0 resections. The regimen at the recommended dose is well tolerated, with few grade 3 or 4 adverse events and no treatment-related deaths."

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy