CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 13 No. 3 1
German Rectal Cancer Study Group findings 

Chemoradiotherapy Before Surgery Improves Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer

By JAMES L. ABBRUZZESE, MD
The University of Texas
M . D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas
| March 1, 2004

SALT LAKE CITY-Compared with patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who receive chemoradiotherapy postoperatively, those who receive chemoradiotherapy preoperatively have a downstaging of their cancer at surgery, a lower rate of local recurrence, a higher rate of sphincter preservation when tumors are low-lying, and a lower rate of adverse effects, according to early results of the German Rectal Cancer Study (CAO/ARO/AIO-94). Lead author Rolf Sauer, MD, director of the Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Germany, presented the results at the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO plenary session, abstract 2). "Because of the radiobiological advantages that preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy provides, the German Rectal Cancer Study Group in the mid-90s started this protocol, which compared neoadjuvant vs adjuvant chemoradiotherapy," Dr. Sauer said. Patients were enrolled in the phase III randomized trial from 26 institutions; they had stage II or III rectal cancer (T3/T4 or N-positive disease), as diagnosed by endorectal ultrasound or the Mason procedure, and were younger than 75 years, Dr. Sauer said. They were assigned to preoperative or postoperative concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy, consisting of 50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy frac- tions and a continuous fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil) (5-FU) infusion over 120 hours during the first and the fifth weeks of radiation therapy, and then four courses of adjuvant maintenance 5-FU. Patients in the postoperative chemoradiotherapy arm also received a 5.4-Gy boost. All patients underwent total mesorectal excision at an interval of 4 to 6 weeks from chemoradiotherapy. "To exclude the impact of the surgeon as a well-known prognostic factor in rectal cancer treatment, stratification was done on the individual surgeon. This is unique in all randomized trials so far," Dr. Sauer said. Outcomes were assessed during a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 4 to 89 months) in 405 patients given preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 394 patients given postoperative chemoradiotherapy, Dr. Sauer said. According to intention to treat, patients in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy group had a 5-year rate of local recurrence that was half that of patients in the other group (6% vs 12%, P = .006). The 5-year rates of distant recurrence were similar (30% for preoperative therapy vs 34% for postoperative therapy), as were the rates of diseasefree (65% vs 61%) and overall survival (74%). "Until now, the incidence of distant metastases has been equal in both groups, which is why we have not seen an improvement in disease-free or overall survival," he noted. About one-third of patients in each treatment group experienced any grade 3/4 acute toxicity from the chemoradiotherapy (28% vs 40%), but rates of severe diarrhea were markedly lower in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy group. Patients in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy group had a significantly lower rate of chronic toxicity in terms of anastomotic site stenosis (4% vs 12%). "There was no evidence of perioperative and postoperative surgical complications after preoperative chemoradiation. The complication rates have been very low," Dr. Sauer said. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy resulted in a highly significant downstaging of cancer at surgery, with about 8% of patients in this group having a pathologically confirmed complete remission and stabilization of lymph node metastases, Dr. Sauer reported. The International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage distributions at surgery for patients in the preoperative and postoperative groups, respec tively, were as follows: stage I (25% vs 18%), stage II (29% vs 28%), stage III (26% vs 39%), and stage IV (6% vs 7%), with stage unknown for some patients (6%, P = .0001). Before randomization, surgeons predicted that 188 patients with lowlying tumors would need abdominoperineal resection, Dr. Sauer said. In this subgroup, rates of sphincter preservation at the time of surgery were twice as high among patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy as among those who received postoperative chemoradiotherapy (39% vs 19%, P = .004). "The conclusion of these first results is that preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly improved local control, improved sphincter preservation in low-lying tumors, and reduced acute and chronic toxicity. And so we anticipate that preoperative chemoradiation should be the new standard treatment for advanced rectal cancer, at least in Germany," Dr. Sauer said.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.





An Annual Review of Gastrointestinal Cancer


 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy