CHAPEL HILL, NC-"Local
failure in inoperable non-small-cell
lung cancer (NSCLC) is high, about
80%-and cure is impossible without
local control. The radiotherapy
community has not addressed this
problem," said Julian C. Rosenman,
MD, PhD, professor of radiation oncology
at the University of North
Carolina (UNC), Chapel Hill. "A 10-
cm tumor compared with a 1-mm
tumor has a 1-million-fold increase
in size, but our response is to reduce
dose." For example, he said, a T1c prostate tumor is treated with 75 Gy
of radiation, whereas a vastly larger
stage IIIa or IIIb NSCLC is typically
treated with 60 Gy.
Questioning 60 Gy
Dr. Rosenman discussed evidence
that the 60-Gy dose is insufficient in
this patient population, and reported
on UNC data suggesting that dose
escalation improves survival. The 60-
Gy standard, he said, is based on a
decades-old Radiation Therapy Oncology
Group study (RTOG 73-01)
that was conducted before the availability
of computed tomography scans
and contemporary chemotherapy.
This dose has been challenged in four
randomized studies but not bested.
For example, Johnson and colleagues
randomized 319 patients with
locally advanced NSCLC to receive vindesine(Drug information on vindesine) (Eldisine) 3 mg/m2, standard
thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy
over a period of 6 weeks, or both
vindesine and thoracic radiotherapy (Ann Intern Med 113(1): 33-38,
1990). Median survival time was 8.6
months for radiotherapy alone, 9.4
months for radiotherapy plus
vindesine, and 10.1 months for
vindesine alone.
"The investigators concluded that
radiotherapy does not prolong survival
over drug therapy, but an alternative
interpretation is that 60 Gy is
too low a dose for cure and too high
for palliation," Dr. Rosenman said.
"Most patients today are being treated
with 55 to 60 Gy. Perhaps a million
patients have been treated at these
levels. Shame on us."
Dose Pushed to 74 Gy
Dr. Rosenman and colleagues examined
the radiotherapy dose in UNC
study LCCC 9603 for inoperable stage
IIIa/IIIb NSCLC patients with a performance
status of 0 or 1. Patients
were treated with induction carboplatin(Drug information on carboplatin) (Paraplatin) to AUC 6 and paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel) 225 mg/m2, with cycles
starting on days 1 and 22. Beginning
on day 43, patients received concurrent
chemoradiotherapy weekly with
carboplatin to AUC 2 and paclitaxel
45 mg/m2, and radiation doses were
escalated from 60 to 74 Gy. In 62 patients
with NSCLC on carboplatin/
paclitaxel with radiation escalated
from 60 to 74 Gy, survival at 1 year
was 71%, at 2 years was 50%, at 3
years was 38%, and at 5 years was
29%. Median survival time was 24
months, at a median survivor-followup
duration of 43 months. Dr.
Rosenman said five other recent studies
using 60 Gy reported median survival
times of 15.6 to 19 months. He
added that the radiation dose in the
UNC study was escalated only to
74 Gy because it hit the "DCP-or
Doctor Chicken Point" rather than
because of adverse effects.
Phase III Trial
Concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy
has produced promising
responses in NSCLC, perhaps owing
to the radiosensitizing effects of chemotherapy.
"There are also hints that
better local control might improve
survival," Dr. Rosenman said. Consequently, he and colleagues set about
designing a multi-institutional, phase
III trial to compare high-dose vs standard-
dose radiotherapy with concurrent
chemotherapy in patients with
stage IIIa or IIIb NSCLC. Each treatment
regimen will be further randomized
to amifostine(Drug information on amifostine) (Ethyol) or no
amifostine (see Figure 1).The hope is
that amifostine will permit more tolerable
radiotherapy dose-escalation,
which might translate into longer
survival.
