BERN, Switzerland-In patients
with follicular lymphoma, rituximab(Drug information on rituximab)
(Rituxan) retreatment after
relapse often produces response rates
at least as great as those following
initial treatment.[1,2] This has led to
speculation that extended or maintenance
therapy with rituximab may
prolong the duration of the initial
response.
Michele Ghielmini, MD, and colleagues
with the Swiss Group for Clinical
Cancer Research (SAKK), based
in Bern, Switzerland, have investigated
rituximab induction and maintenance
therapy in 202 patients with newly
diagnosed or resistant/relapsed follicular
lymphoma (ASH abstract
604).[3] Updated data show that the
response rate after induction therapy
(375 mg/m2/week for 4 weeks) among
185 evaluable patients was 67% in
newly diagnosed patients and 46% in
patients who had received previous
therapy.[3] Patients who responded
or achieved stable disease were ran
domized
at week 12 to observation
and no further treatment or to rituximab
maintenance (375 mg/m2 every
8 weeks).
Maintenance vs Observation
A total of 151 patients were randomized
to rituximab maintenance
or observation. The patient and baseline
disease characteristics for the two
treatment groups were well balanced.
Median age was 57 years; 97% of patients
had a performance status of 0 or
1; 85% had stage III or IV disease;
52% had bone marrow involvement;
30% had elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase;
and 18% had received
prior radiation therapy.
After a median follow-up of 35
months, the median event-free survival
was 23 months for the rituximab
maintenance group and 12 months
for the observation group (P = .02)
(see Table 1).[1,3] This difference was
more pronounced for patients who
were chemotherapy naive (36 months
vs 19 months for observation only;
P = .009). The majority of patients
(80%) in the maintenance group were
still in remission compared with 56%
of those in the observation group
(P = .01). Thirty-four patients in this
study improved the quality of their
response, with the complete response
rate increasing from 10% to 29%.
Circulating B-cell counts returned
to within 65% of baseline in patients
in the observation group compared
with 33% for those in the rituximab
maintenance group (P = .04). Immunoglobulin
G, A, and M levels remained
stable in the plasma of patients
in the observation arm, while
the Ig M level was significantly lowered
in the maintenance arm, and
infectious complications were rare
and similar for both treatment groups.
In summary, the addition of rituximab
maintenance therapy at 2-
month intervals reduced the risk of
relapse by 55% for responding patients
and significantly improved the
remission rate at 1 year with no additional
toxicity. The authors concluded
that this randomized study confirms
the efficacy of maintenance
rituximab in patients with follicular
lymphoma.
Results Corroborated
Another study showing the benefits
of maintenance therapy for delaying
or preventing relapse in rituximab-
sensitive patients was recently
published in the Journal of Clinical
Oncology. In that study, John
Hainsworth, MD, of the Sarah Cannon
Cancer Center in Nashville, Tennessee,
and others reported results of
a 6-month rituximab maintenance
regimen in patients with newly diagnosed
follicular small cleaved, follicular
mixed, or small lymphocytic lymphoma.[
1]
Similar to the study presented by
Dr. Ghielmini,[3] patient responses
improved after maintenance therapy,
with 18 patients converting from stable
disease or partial response to complete
response after receiving maintenance
therapy. The actuarial
progression-free survival was 34
months after a median of 30 months
of follow-up (see Table 1).
The ideal schedule for rituximab
maintenance therapy in patients with
newly diagnosed vs relapsed or refractory
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
has not yet been identified.
