CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 17 No. 2
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Mutational status affects nilotinib responses in CP-CML

February 1, 2008

ATLANTA—In a significant proportion of imatinib(Drug information on imatinib) (Gleevec)-resistant chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia patients with Bcr-Abl mutations, nilotinib(Drug information on nilotinib) (Tasigna) treatment results in hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular responses, Timothy P. Hughes, MD, of the Hanson Institute, Adelaide, Australia, said at ASH 2007 (abstract 320).

Nilotinib is active against most Bcr-Abl mutations, with the exception of T3151.

The mutational analysis included 275 Philadelphia chromosome positive CP-CML patients: 68% imatinib resistant and 32% imatinib intolerant. Overall, 41% of patients had baseline Bcr-Abl mutations: 10% of imatinib-intolerant patients and 56% of imatinib-resistant patients.

Among baseline mutations, 13% were in less nilotinib-sensitive mutation groups (IC50 > 150 nM). Three percent in the T3151 group (IC50 > 10,000 nM) were excluded from analysis.

Reporting best responses at 12 months, Dr. Hughes said that clinical efficacy for nilotinib was seen in both the mutation and nonmutation groups. Responses were higher for patients with no mutation vs any mutation: Complete hematological responses (81% vs 71%), major cytogenetic responses (60% vs 50%), complete cytogenetic responses (CCyRs, 42% vs 32%), and major molecular responses (25% vs 21%).

Among patients with the less sensitive mutations, there were no CCyRs. On the other hand, response rates were comparable in patients without baseline mutations and with more sensitive mutations (IC50 ≤ 150 nM). Newly detectable mutations during therapy were found in 28% and 13% of imatinib-resistant patients with and without baseline mutations, respectively, and in 11% and 3%, respectively, of imatinib-intolerant patients.

Among 42 progressing patients, 31% had no baseline mutation, 33% had the same mutation as at baseline, and 36% had a newly detectable mutation.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy