CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 17 No. 6
Focus on Colon Cancer 

Elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients can receive standard regimens with irinotecan

By Caroline Helwick

| June 1, 2008
A randomized trial showed good results with an irinotecan-based regimen, despite increased toxicity, but the best way to give the agent in elderly patients remains unclear.

ORLANDO—Patients aged 75 and older with metastatic colorectal cancer can be treated with standard combination chemotherapy regimens, despite increased toxicity, according to results of the FFCD 2001-02 trial. French investigators reported planned interim data at the 2008 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium (abstract 281).

Older patients have traditionally received “suboptimal management” and have not enjoyed an improvement in survival, said principal investigator

Emmanuel Mitry, MD, of the CHU Ambroise Pare, Boulogne. He said the trial addressed the question, “Should we use combination therapy with irinotecan(Drug information on irinotecan) [Camptosar] and oxaliplatin(Drug information on oxaliplatin) [Eloxatin], or use 5-FU [fluorouracil] only?”

The study included 209 patients aged 75 or older (median, 80 years) with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were randomized to receive one of two 5-FU chemotherapy regimens, either alone or in combination with irinotecan. The interim analysis included data from 166 patients; all received at least one chemotherapy cycle.

Response rates were 18% for 5-FU only and 31% for patients who also received irinotecan, with a 1% complete response rate in each arm. Stable disease was seen in 51% and 57%, respectively, for a clinical benefit rate of 69% with 5-FU and 88% when irinotecan was included, Dr. Mitry reported.

Mortality was 57% in each arm, due to progression in the vast majority of cases. The overall 60-day mortality rate was 12.7%.

Irinotecan more toxic

Combination therapy was more toxic, with 48% of patients experiencing grade 3-4 toxicities vs 16% with 5-FU alone. Neutropenia grade 3-4 occurred in 28% and 1%, respectively, and febrile neutropenia in 9% and 1%.

Diarrhea was also more common, occurring in 63% of patients receiving irinotecan vs 39% for 5-FU alone, with severe diarrhea reported by 16% vs 0%, respectively, he said. Toxic deaths were rare and equivalent between the arms (one each).

Dr. Mitry said the results, although “preliminary and only descriptive,” suggest that phase III trials specific to elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are feasible, and that the elderly can receive most standard chemotherapy regimens.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy