CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 17 No. 6
 

Novel BiTE antibody mediates contact between T cells and cancer cells

By Caroline Helwick

| June 1, 2008
BiTE antibodies bind to both T cells and tumor cells to form a momentary link between them that sets off the deadly T-cell machinery.

SAN DIEGO—A new way of harnessing the body’s immune system to attack cancer cells has produced impressive preclinical and early clinical results, according to investigators interviewed at the 2008 American Association of Cancer Research annual meeting.

The novel compounds are antibodies called bi-specific T-cell engagers (BiTE). BiTE antibodies leverage the cytotoxicity of T cells by mediating contact between T cells and cancer cells, thereby inducing an immunological synapse between the two (see Figure). As a result, the T cells are able to deliver cytotoxic proteins into tumor cells, thereby eradicating not only the primary tumor but also micrometatases, said Christian Itin, PhD, who is CEO of Micromet, Inc, Baltimore.

The company name, in fact, derives from the company’s research philosophy that micrometastases are the fundamental challenge in eradicating cancer.

“With conventional antibodies, we fail to enlist the most potent part of the immune system, the T cells. The idea behind BiTE antibodies is to make a patient’s T cells capable of seeing the cancer,” Dr. Itin told ONI. With this in mind, researchers developed an “adaptor” that links T cells to tumor cells and activates the T cells. Figure

“This technology is selective for the tumor, and it goes after rapidly growing as well as disseminating tumors,” he said. Moreover, when T cells encounter large numbers of tumor cells, they multiply and become formidable enough to take on even large tumor masses, he added.

According to Dr. Itin, these compounds are remarkably robust. “There are no other cytotoxic or biologic agents that come close to this level of potency, and in contrast to chemotherapy, there are no damaging bystander effects,” he said.

Several products under investigation

The most advanced product utilizing the BiTE technology is MT103, whose target antigen is CD19, which is present on most leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells. MT103 is in phase II trials in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and NHL. Also in development is MT110, which targets the EpCAM antigen, expressed in 85% of all solid tumors. MT110 is now in phase I trials in gastrointestinal and lung cancer.

Two additional BiTE antibodies are in preclinical development for melanoma (MCSP specific) and acute myeloid leukemia (CD33 specific) (abstract 2404).

Dr. Itin also pointed to abstract 2402, which described the re-engineering of conventional antibodies—trastuzumab [Herceptin], cetuximab(Drug information on cetuximab) [Erbitux], and panitumumab [Vectibix]—into highly active BiTE antibodies. “We can essentially teach commercial antibodies new tricks—how to recruit T cells for a very selective and effective lysis of target cells,” he said.

Delivering the antibody

Allowing for the time it takes T cells to “scan” the entire body, the drug needs to be given over 4 to 8 weeks. “We have observed responses in 4 weeks, and with an additional 4 weeks managed to convert some partial responders to complete responders. Complete responders are offered another 4 weeks of consolidation therapy to give the T cells more time to find the last tumor cell. When the patient progresses, we think we can re-treat with this drug,” Dr. Itin said.

Currently, the drug is administered with a small pump for continuous delivery into the bloodstream. In the future, investigators expect to use subcutaneous delivery, possibly by means of a mini-pump like that used to deliver insulin to diabetics, said Peter Kufer, MD, PhD, vice president of immunotherapy at Micromet, who reported the feasibility of this approach (abstracts 2131 and 2403).

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Bladder Cancer Recurrence High, Better Follow-Up Care Needed
  • ASCO: Post-Surgery Surveillance Found Safe in Seminoma
  • Fertility Preservation in Women With Breast Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities
  • Addressing Fertility Concerns in Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer: Will Serial Reserve Screening Help?
  • Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy