CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 17 No. 9
 

Adjuvant gemcitabine improves outcomes of pancreatic ca

By Susan London

| September 1, 2008
Final results of the CONKO-001 trial show significant gains in both disease-free survival and overall survival with this chemotherapy.

CHICAGO—Compared with observation, adjuvant gemcitabine(Drug information on gemcitabine) (Gemzar) reduces the risk of ULF Neumannrecurrence by 45% and the risk of death by 28% in patients with resected pancreatic cancer, according to final results of the CONKO-001 trial.

 

In the phase III trial, patients who had undergone a complete resection of pancreatic cancer were randomized to adjuvant gemcitabine or observation. The final analysis, which had a cutoff of March 2008, was based on 179 patients in the gemcitabine group and 175 patients in the observation group. Lead investigator Ulf P. Neumann, MD, PhD, of the Charité School of Medicine in Berlin noted that the majority of patients had T3 or T4 tumors (86%) and node-positive disease (72%).

 

Benefits

 

Median disease-free survival, previously reported last year (Oettle H et al: JAMA 297:267-277, 2007), remained significantly longer in the gemcitabine group relative to the observation group in the final analysis (13.4 vs 6.9 months), with a significant 45% reduction in the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.55).

 

Moreover, this benefit was also significant in subgroups of patients stratified by resection type (R0 vs R1), nodal status (positive vs negative), and T stage (T 1/2 vs T 3/4).

 

Median overall survival, which did not differ by treatment in the earlier analysis, was now significantly longer with gemcitabine (22.8 vs 20.2 months), with a significant 28% reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.72).

 

“The curves for the observation arm and the treatment arm separate about 2 years after the operation,” Dr. Neumann noted during his talk at ASCO 2008 (abstract 4504).

 

The absolute survival advantage of gemcitabine increased with time and resulted in long-term survival for about one-fifth of patients (see Table).

 

Table 1

 

“Adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine doubles the long-term survival rate after 5 years compared with observation,” he pointed out.

 

Analyses of this outcome in subgroups, which Dr. Neumann cautioned were too small to produce definitive conclusions, suggested that gemcitabine conferred a significant survival benefit relative to observation after R0 resection (22.8 vs 20.3 months) and a trend toward one after R1 resection (22.1 vs 14.1 months).

 

Also, there was a trend toward better survival among patients with T1 or T2 tumors (40.6 vs 27.0 months) as well as significantly better survival among those with T3 or T4 tumors (21.0 vs 19.0 months).

 

Summing up the findings, Dr. Neumann asserted that treatment with gemcitabine improves both disease-free and overall survival in this population.

 

“Gemcitabine should be the standard of care for adjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer,” he concluded.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy