CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 15 No. 12
 

Longer Androgen Deprivation Isn't Better, Study Suggests

December 1, 2006

PHILADELPHIA—In a study of high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, more than 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy was associated with higher mortality than shorter durations, Cliff Robinson, MD, reported at the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO abstract 2302).

The retrospective analysis showed that treatment failure rates were similar with longer and shorter durations. Androgen deprivation for longer than 6 months was associated with a twofold increase in mortality, said Dr. Robinson, a radiation oncology resident at the Cleveland Clinic.

The current recommendation for at least 2 years of androgen deprivation as part of the definitive treatment of high-risk prostate cancer is based on older studies in patient groups no longer representative of the prostate cancer population, Dr. Robinson said. The studies were completed in the pre-PSA era, mostly in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Today, few patients have locally advanced cancer at diagnosis, and risk classification is based instead on initial PSA level, Gleason score, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage.

He added that the current study included surgery patients, which other previous studies did not, and the radiation therapy patients in the current study received a higher dose than in prior trials.

The analysis was conducted in 579 high-risk (by the modern definition) patients treated at the Cleveland Clinic between 1998 and 2003. Patients received external beam radiation (67%), radical prostatectomy (29%), or a permanent prostate radioactive seed implant (4%). Patients were followed a mean of 5 years after definitive treatment. Androgen deprivation therapy was used in 74% of patients and lasted longer than 6 months (median, 15 months) in 17%.

The incidence of biochemical and clinical failure was unrelated to the duration of androgen deprivation. In a multivariate analysis, more than 6 months of androgen deprivation was an independent predictor of death (relative risk 2.1 vs no treatment, P = .03), as were pack-years of cigarette smoking and Gleason score. "The reasons patients receiving longer term hormone therapy may do worse are unclear," he said. "A number of factors could complicate the issue, and this area needs further investigation before any conclusions can be drawn." The next step, he said, will be to investigate medical comorbidity as a possible confounder.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy