CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 16 No. 6
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Intrathecal 131I-8H9 for CNS Mets

June 1, 2007

LOS ANGELES—Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody 131I-8H9, delivered intrathecally, appears to have clinical utility when added to salvage therapy for patients with metastatic cancer to the central nervous system (CNS), according to a phase I study reported at the 2007 American Association of Cancer Research annual meeting (LB-4).

Disseminated malignant primary brain tumors and other cancers that metastasize through the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are challenging to treat. Antibody-based targeted therapies given through the CSF compartment have real therapeutic potential with regard to tumors that metastasize to the leptomeninges (LM), said principal investigator Kim Kramer, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, who presented the findings at a late-breaking trials session.

Monoclonal antibody 8H9 is a murine IgG1 antibody reactive with a wide spectrum of human solid tumors. The compound 131I-8H9, which is administered through a ventricular access device, has favorable pharmacokinetics in nonhuman primates and poses minimal toxicity.

The study involved 19 patients, aged 2 to 51 years, with refractory or recurrent CNS or LM malignancies that were shown to be 8H9 reactive. Multiple parenchymal lesions were observed in 7 patients and LM disease in 9. Tumors included neuroblastoma (n = 10), melanoma (n = 2), medulloblastoma (n = 3), pineoblastoma (n = 1), and ependymoma (n = 3).

Patients had baseline MRI of the brain and spine, and CSF cytology. Patients received a dosimetry dose of 2 mCi of intrathecal 131I-8H9, after which CSF and blood were sampled serially for pharmacokinetics, and nuclear scans were performed at 24 hours to evaluate drug localization. Therapeutic doses were 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mCi, with three to six patients per dose level. At 1 month post-injection, more MRI studies were done, and if no progressive disease or grade 3-4 toxicity was noted, the treatment was repeated.

The 19 patients received 56 injections: 16 patients received at least one full cycle (dosimetry and therapy injections), and 10 of the 16 received two full cycles; 3 received only the dosimetry dose. Mean dose to the CSF was 35.4 cGy/mCi, with 50% of injections being 20 to 50 cGy/mCi. Total CSF dose was 314 to 2,917 cGy. In contrast, the mean blood dose was 2.34 cGy/mCi, with an average CSF:blood ratio of 15:1 in all patients.

"So far, there has been a low toxicity profile, with no allergic, cardiovascular, or pulmonary toxicities," Dr. Kramer reported. "Transient grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting or fever was common in the immediate post-injection period, as was a transient rise in liver enzymes. Thus far, the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached, at 50 mCi."

Response Profile

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy