CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 16 No. 12
Pages: 1  2  
Next
Focus on Colon Cancer 

Third-line single-agent cetuximab ups overall survival

By Patrick Young | December 1, 2007

Cetuximab(Drug information on cetuximab) (Erbitux) plus best supportive care (BSC) provided significantly better overall survival and progression-free survival, compared with BSC alone, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had failed or could not take all approved chemotherapies, according to an international research team.

Patients in the treatment group had a hazard ratio for death of 0.77 (P = .005) for overall survival and a hazard ratio for disease progression or death of 0.68 for progression-free survival (P < .001).

"This is the first time an antibody used as a single agent in colorectal cancer has demonstrated an overall survival benefit," noted Eric K. Rowinsky, MD, chief medical officer and senior vice president of ImClone, maker of Erbitux.

The company used the overall survival data to support cetuximab's use as a single agent in the third-line treatment of EGFR-expressing colorectal cancer patients after failure of both irinotecan(Drug information on irinotecan) (Camptosar)- and oxaliplatin(Drug information on oxaliplatin) (Eloxatin)-based regimens. FDA approved new labeling that included the survival results on October 2.

Details of the multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III trial, conducted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine (Jonker et al: 357:2040-2048, 2007).

The trial included 572 patients with EGFR-positive disease who had not responded to a fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (defined as unacceptable adverse events or progression within 6 months after completing treatment) or had contraindications to the drugs. All patients received BSC, defined as measures intended to palliate symptoms and improve quality of life.

Researchers administered cetuximab intravenously at an initial dose of 400 mg/m2 of body surface area over 120 minutes, followed by weekly infusions of 250 mg/m2 over 60 minutes. Treatments continued until death unless unacceptable adverse events, tumor progression, or worsening cancer symptoms occurred, or the patient requested that treatment end. Cetuximab treatment ranged from 1 to 60 weeks, with a median duration of 8.1 weeks. By the date of analysis, 222 of the 278 treatment patients and 234 of the 285 BSC-only patients had died. All but six deaths resulted from colorectal cancer.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy