CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 16 No. 12
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Sunitinib is cost-effective in metastatic renal ca patients

By Walter Alexander | December 1, 2007

BARCELONA—Sunitinib (Sutent) is a cost-effective treatment for metastatic renal cell cancer, according to a report at the 14th European Cancer Conference (ECCO abstract 4514).

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for sunitinib vs interferon over 10 years in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma of $67,215 per life-year gained and $52,593 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained is within the established theoretical threshold of $50,000 to $100,000, said Sylvie Negrier, MD, of the Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France. Actual willingness to pay for targeted cancer therapies, however, varies widely, Dr. Negrier said.

Based on outcomes data

Dr. Negrier's cost-benefit analysis was based on outcomes data—presented by Robert J. Motzer, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) at ASCO 2007 and updated at ECCO—from an international multicenter study directly comparing sunitinib against interferon in 750 patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cancer.

In that clinical trial, better tumor responses in all MSKCC risk factor groups with sunitinib translated into a survival benefit for sunitinib patients (median progression-free survival, 11 months vs 4 months for those on interferon). In addition, sunitinib produced fewer major adverse events.

Both sunitinib and interferon carried a heavy price tag: The total discounted cost for sunitinib, including all ancillary treatments, was $224,970, a roughly 4% increase over the $217,436 cost of interferon.

Dr. Negrier noted that sunitinib treatment would be expected to give an advantage over no treatment of 0.92 progression-free years and 2.09 total life-years. Interferon vs no treatment would give a progression-free survival advantage of 0.51 years, and a total life-year advantage of 1.98 years. The virtue of sunitinib, she said, is therefore in delaying the inevitable progression. Dr. Negrier estimated that sunitinib carries an additional cost of $18,611 per progression-free life-year gained, compared with interferon.

"Best supportive care costs were higher with interferon, while first-line drug costs and routine follow-up costs were higher in the sunitinib-treated patients, due in part to longer-term treatment and survival," Dr. Negrier said.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy