CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 16 No. 12
Pages: 1  2  3  
Next
Focus on Breast Cancer 

Boost may reduce effects of positive lumpectomy margins

By Susan London | December 1, 2007

LOS ANGELES—Adding a radiation therapy boost to the lumpectomy site after lumpectomy with whole-breast radiation therapy reduces the risk of local recurrence, particularly among breast cancer patients with high-risk features, including positive margins.

Speaking at the ASTRO annual meeting (abstract 4), lead author Heather Jones, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh, presented the updated 10-year results of the EORTC Boost–No Boost Trial, along with a look at risk factors for recurrence.

At the time of the study, Dr. Jones was at the Holzer Center for Cancer Care, Gallipolis, Ohio. Principal investigator is Harry Bartlelink, MD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute.

"Our patients who opt for breast-conserving therapy vs mastectomy have a nontrivial risk for local recurrence," Dr. Jones said. "Preventing such a local recurrence is an important clinical parameter, as there is now evidence that local control is indeed linked to long-term survival in our early breast cancer patients."

Study patients had stage I or II breast cancer and underwent lumpectomy followed by whole-breast irradiation with 50 Gy. Thereafter, the 5,318 patients with microscopically completely excised tumors were randomly assigned to no additional treatment or to a 16-Gy boost, while the 251 patients with microscopically incompletely excised tumors were randomized to a 10-Gy or 26-Gy boost.

Ten-year results from the group with completely excised tumors (J Clin Oncol 25:3259-3265, 2007) showed that the 16-Gy boost significantly reduced the cumulative rate of local recurrence, compared with no boost (7% vs 12%, HR 0.59).

"Unlike our 5-year update, our 10-year update shows that this relative reduction by the boost is seen in all age categories. Still, the absolute benefit is greatly obtained by our young patients, particularly those 40 years old and less," Dr. Jones noted. At the same time, the boost significantly increased the rate of severe fibrosis (4.4% vs 1.6%).

Pages: 1  2  3  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Skin Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy