CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 8 No. 6
 

Study Suggests Short Time Interval for Ovarian Cancer Screening

June 1, 1999

PHILADELPHIA—To be effective, the time interval for ovarian cancer screening should be no more than a year, a screening trial of 22,000 postmenopausal women suggests. In this study, 67 women were identified with ovarian cancer. For 28 of these women, ovarian cancer was detected within 1 year of their last CA 125 blood test.

Overall, the investigators found, based on review of longitudinal CA 125 tests, that ovarian cancer started an average of 1.9 years before it was found clinically. The results were reported at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).

A 2-Year Window

“This means there is about a 2-year window between the development of ovarian cancer and its clinical detection,” said Steven J. Skates, PhD, one of the study investigators. Dr. Skates is assistant professor of biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital.

The screening trial was conducted at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, between 1986 and 1995, under the direction of Ian Jacobs, MD.

In the study, all volunteers underwent an initial prevalence CA 125 test, Dr. Skates reported. Then they were randomized to a further three annual screens or a control arm. If CA 125 levels exceeded 30 U/mL, the woman was recalled for a pelvic ultrasound and 3-monthly CA 125 tests for 1 year. If the ultrasound exam was abnormal, a gynecologic consult was arranged.

All of the study volunteers underwent a follow-up on cancer status in December, 1997, through the UK National Cancer Registry, Dr. Skates said.

“Screening for ovarian cancer,” Dr. Skates said, “is an appealing approach to reducing mortality from this disease because most cases are currently detected in late-stage disease, resulting in a very low survival rate. A crucial component of designing trials to test approaches to screening for ovarian cancer is the interval between regular tests.”

Proposed trials, he observed, have intervals ranging from every year, to every 1½ years, to once every 3 years.

“Estimates on the preclinical duration of disease provide vital information for this design issue,” Dr. Skates said. “Now we have an empirical estimate of the preclinical duration of ovarian cancer. The fact that it is a short 2 years means that if we are going to screen for ovarian cancer and detect it at an early stage, screening every year is a requisite—and screening every 2 years will miss many of the early stages of ovarian cancers.”

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy