CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 8 No. 5
 

Delirium Is Often Misdiagnosed in Advanced Cancer

May 1, 1999

CLEVELAND—Delirium, although common in patients with advanced cancer, is poorly understood, Donna S. Zhukovsky, MD, said at a conference on palliative medicine held at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Properly identifying delirium can be difficult, and the literature shows that it frequently goes unrecognized by physicians and nurses, said Dr. Zhukovsky, of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation’s Harry R. Horvitz Center for Palliative Medicine.

Delirium is characterized by a disturbance in consciousness and a change in cognition that develop in a brief period of time, she said. It tends to fluctuate over the course of the day, so that patients with delirium may have periods of normality interspersed with delirium.

In cancer patients, treatment side effects of drugs or radiation can cause delirium. Other possible causes include metabolic encephalopathies, infection, anemias, nutritional deficiencies, and paraneoplastic syndromes.

Although impaired thinking and memory are common to both delirium and dementia, patients with dementia tend to have a more stable course, Dr. Zhukovsky said. They have a more gradual onset of cognitive impairment, and their impairment does not fluctuate throughout the day. They usually have no clouding of consciousness and deteriorate over longer periods of time.

Delirium is present in 8% to 85% of cancer patients, according to the literature, with the variation explained by different study populations and assessment tools. “Delirium is found in 20% to 40% of people with advanced cancer,” Dr. Zhukovsky said.

Delirium is extremely common preceding death, which raises implications for obtaining patient consent to medical treatment. In one study, patients developed cognitive failure, on average, 16 days prior to death. The cause of the delirium could not be identified in 56% of these patients (Bruera E et al: J Pain Symptom Manage 7:192-195, 1992).

When treating delirium, the clinician must recognize that the situation is often related to multiple factors, including the disease process, medical comorbidities, and medications, Dr. Zhukovsky said.

Three Subtypes

There are three delirium subtypes: hypoalert, hyperalert, and mixed. These different subtypes have different prognoses, with hyperalert having the best prognosis in terms of mortality, she said.

Patients with hyperalert (or hyperactive) delirium are agitated, often with hallucinations and delusions. This is the most common type of delirium, she said, and it is often quickly identified because of the patient’s behavioral problems.

With hypoalert (or lethargic) delirium, patients are sleepy and withdrawn. Hypoalert delirium is frequently undiagnosed or misdiagnosed as depression. “People with the hypoalert form are often not recognized because they are not behavioral problems and therefore are not treated,” Dr. Zhukovsky said.

People with delirium may have periods of normal cognition. This further complicates the diagnosis. In the Bruera study, cognitive failure identified by the Mini-Mental Status Exam (see box) was overlooked by the physician on the same day in 23% of cases and by the nurse in 20% of cases.

Assessment Tools for Delirium

The Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) is the “gold standard” of neurophysical tests. However, for patients with speech, motor, or visual disabilities, it has limitations, Dr.

Zhukovsky said at the conference on palliative care. In addition, the 3 to 5 minutes needed to do the MMSE may be too taxing for a sick patient.

Many other tools exist for the assessment of delirium, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Clearly, the development of more sensitive and user friendly” assessment tools is needed, Dr. Zhukovsky said.

She recommended the study of Smith et al for a look at more than 20 assessment instruments, including the MMSE (J Pain Symptom Manage 10:35-77, 1995). The tools were evaluated according to four characteristics: ease of administration, speed of administration, normative data, and reliability. Four types of validity were also evaluated: inspection, screening, diagnostic, and severity.

Treatment for delirium includes adding orienting devices to the environment, such as clocks, calendars, and nightlights, she said. However, the mainstay of treatment is dopamine(Drug information on dopamine)-blocking agents such as haloperidol(Drug information on haloperidol), while correcting the contributing causes whenever possible.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy