CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 8 No. 2 1
Highlights From ASH 1998 

‘Hot’ Antibody Improves Remission Durations in Refractory Indolent NHL

February 1, 1999

ANN ARBOR, Michigan—A radiolabeled monoclonal antibody was more effective than previous chemotherapy had been in more than half of patients with indolent lymphomas, in a study reported at the American Society of Hematology meeting.

Mark S. Kaminski, MD, and his colleagues at the University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, and other major centers conducted a phase III study of Coulter Pharmaceutical’s investigational agent, Bexxar (iodine-131 tositumomab) for chemotherapy-refractory low-grade or transformed low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL).

‘Inexorable Relapse Rate’

Dr. Kaminski said that work with the antibody was undertaken in an attempt to overcome the “inexorable relapse rate” following chemotherapy in this type of cancer, in which the duration of response becomes shorter and shorter with each succeeding round of chemotherapy (see Figure 1).

The new agent is a radiolabeled murine IgG2a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen on B cells. CD20 is thought to be a good target because it is membrane-bound, is not shed, and is present in 95% of B-cell NHL. CD19 and CD22 are also potential targets for this type of therapy (Figure 2).

Dr. Kaminski said that tositumomab is a promising antibody because it triggers apoptosis, recruits the immune system response, inhibits B-cell proliferation, and induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.

Radioconjugated antibodies have attracted attention because they may have a “crossfire” effect and thus may be able to kill nearby antigen-negative tumor cells as well as those expressing the target antigen.

Potential Disadvantages

Potential disadvantages of a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody include the possible need for patient isolation; potentially dose-limiting toxicity (myelosuppression); and toxicity or development of a HAMA (human antimouse antibody) response that may limit re-treatment with the antibody or future treatment with other therapies.

Eligible patients had low-grade or transformed lymphoma, had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens, and had failed to respond or had responses lasting less than 6 months on the last therapy.

Sixty patients were enrolled in the study, 36 (58%) with low-grade NHL; 23 (40%) with transformed low-grade NHL; and one (2%) with mantle cell lymphoma. On their last previous regimen, only 3% of patients had a complete response, and 25% had a partial response. The median number of prior regimens was four.

The primary study endpoint was the difference in efficacy between 131I-tositumomab and the last qualifying chemotherapy “using patients as their own controls,” Dr. Kaminski said.

A single “dosimetric dose” (450 mg of unlabeled antibody) was given IV, followed by 35 mg of antibody radiolabeled with 5 mCi of iodine-131. Gamma camera counts were used to calculate the required activity (mCi) to deliver the desired therapeutic dose (65 cGy to the whole body for patients with platelet counts between 100,001/mm³ and 149,999/mm³, and 75 cGy for patients with platelets of 150,000/mm³ or more).

The single therapeutic dose (450 mg of unlabeled antibody IV over 1 hour followed by 35 mg of radiolabeled antibody over a half hour) was given 7 to 14 days after the dosimetric dose.

Dr. Kaminski reported responses in 39 of 60 patients (65%) after 131I-tositumomab, compared with 17 of 60 (28%) after the last previous chemotherapy regimen (P < .0001). Complete responses were seen in 17% of patients after antibody therapy vs 3% for the last previous therapy (P = .01). Responses were assessed by a masked randomized review of efficacy data by an independent panel of radiologists and clinicians.

Median duration of response was 6.5 months after 131I-tositumomab vs 3.5 months after the previous chemotherapies, “perhaps indicating a reversal of the natural history of the disease with this therapy,” Dr. Kaminski said.

Responses vs Previous Chemo

Thirty-two patients had a better response to 131I-tositumomab than to previous chemotherapy; 19 had an equivalent response; and 9 had an inferior response.

Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, but nadir neutrophil counts less than 100/mm³ and platelet counts less than 10,000/mm³ occurred in only 2% of patients, Dr. Kaminski said. The nadirs typically occurred at week 5 or 6 with recovery by week 8 or 9. The main nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue, fever, and nausea. There was one treatment-related infection but no deaths. Four patients (7%) developed HAMA.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy