CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 8 No. 9
 

Lilly Enjoined From Promoting Evista for Breast Cancer Prevention

September 1, 1999

WASHINGTON—A US federal court has granted a preliminary injunction barring Eli Lilly and Company and its sales representatives from promoting its drug Evista (raloxifene ) as effective in reducing the risk of breast cancer.

The injunction was sought by AstraZeneca, a unit of Zeneca, Inc., whose drug Nolvadex (tamoxifen) is approved both for treating breast cancer and for reducing the risk of breast cancer in high-risk women. Evista is approved for use in preventing osteoporosis, and some research has suggested that it may be helpful in preventing breast cancer.

The two drugs are currently being tested for effectiveness in preventing breast cancer in STAR, the Study of Tamoxifen(Drug information on tamoxifen) and Raloxifene(Drug information on raloxifene), which began enrolling the first of 22,000 patients in late May.

AstraZeneca filed for an injunction on Feb. 25, under the Lanham Act, a federal statute dealing with false advertising. The company alleged that Lilly’s sales force had falsely promoted Evista to physicians as having been shown to reduce the risk of breast cancer.

In a 106-page decision rendered on July 16, Judge John Koeltl, of the US District Court of the Southern District of New York, granted the injunction. He ordered Lilly to cease any claims that Evista has been shown, proven, demonstrated, or established to reduce the risk of breast cancer and to institute a training program for its sales force to ensure that its representatives conform with the court’s ruling.

However, Judge Koeltl denied Astra-Zeneca’s request that the court require Lilly to distribute corrective advertising.

In a statement, Lilly said it was pleased that “the court found no evidence to support Zeneca’s claim that Lilly is promoting Evista as a drug that is approved or indicated by the FDA for the prevention of breast cancer.” The company said that although it disagreed with several aspects of the court’s decision, it would institute the ordered training program.

“The ruling addresses a very narrow issue,” said Angela Sekston, a spokeswoman for Lilly at its Indianapolis headquarters. She added that an internal review of material provided to physicians showed that they specifically state that Evista has not been demonstrated to reduce the risk of breast cancer. “It appears that our materials are in line with the court’s ruling,” Ms. Sekston said.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Skin Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy