CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 5 No. 2
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Fludarabine Produces CRs as First-Line CLL Therapy

February 1, 1996

SEATTLE--Fludarabine (Fludara) has demonstrated impressive results in previously untreated patients with active chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) when compared with chlorambucil(Drug information on chlorambucil) (Leukeran), Kanti Rai, MD, said at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting.

"Chlorambucil has been the gold standard treatment for CLL," said Dr. Rai, chief of the Department of Hematology and Oncology, Long Island Jewish Hospital, New Hyde Park, NY. Although chlorambucil produces response rates of up to 60% to 70%, the great majority are partial, not complete, responses. "Overall, the natural history of CLL has not been shown to be altered or improved by any treatment, and nothing we did was improving survival," he said.

Fludarabine is currently indicated for the treatment of patients with B-cell CLL who have not responded to, or whose disease has progressed during, treatment with a regimen containing at least one standard alkylating agent. A study from M.D. Anderson showed that fludarabine was significantly more effective in previously untreated patients with active disease, compared with other drugs.

This finding prompted the randomized intergroup study in previously untreated CLL patients with active disease, Dr. Rai said. The study involved the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB), Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Clinical Trial Group of the NCI of Canada, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).

Over a period of 3½ years (October 1990 through April 1994), more than 450 intermediate-risk and high-risk patients were randomized to receive either flu-darabine, 25 mg/m² by ½-hour intravenous infusion daily from days 1 to 5 every 4 weeks, or chlorambucil, 40 mg/m² by mouth on day 1 every 4 weeks.

Initially, a third randomized arm combined the two drugs but was closed when an interim analysis showed unacceptably high hematologic toxicity and a response rate no better than that achieved by fludarabine alone, Dr. Rai said.

The study, with a primary endpoint of complete remission, was comprised of two phases: Patients showing continued beneficial response received the assigned therapy for a maximum of 12 months, and nonresponding patients and those relapsing within 6 months were crossed over to the alternate therapy.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy