CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 8 No. 2 1
Highlights From ASH 1998 

Longer Survival Observed With CHVP Plus Interferon in Elderly High-Risk Follicular Lymphoma Patients

February 1, 1999

LYON, France—The addition of interferon-alfa-2b (IFN, Intron A) to the usual CHVP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin(Drug information on doxorubicin), teniposide(Drug information on teniposide), prednisone(Drug information on prednisone)) extends survival in elderly patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma, Dr. Bertrand Coiffier said at the ASH meeting.

He reported results of a randomized GELA study (Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte) showing longer survival with CHVP plus interferon than with fludarabine (Fludara). “The rationale for the study,” he said, “was to try to increase the efficacy of the chemotherapy by adding interferon.”

Randomization

The study randomized 131 follicular lymphoma patients (all grades) to receive 12 courses of CHVP plus 18 months of interferon or 12 courses of fludarabine in 18 months.

Patients were age 60 to 75 years of age, had follicular lymphoma with a high tumor burden as defined according to the REAL (Revised European American Lymphoma Study Group) classification, and had at least one adverse prognostic factor (77% of patients had more than one poor prognosis factor).

Response Rates and Survival

The response to treatment at 6 months showed a significant difference in favor of CHVP plus interferon (71% vs 58% in the fludarabine arm). At 6 months, 21% of the patients receiving combination therapy had progressed vs 39% on the fludarabine arm.

At 18 months, 57% of CHVP/IFN patients had reached a complete or partial response vs 39% for fludarabine, and 36% had progressed vs 52% on fludarabine.

At median follow-up of 25 months, time to progression and survival were significantly shorter in the fludarabine arm than in the combination arm; 81% of patients receiving CHVP plus interferon were still alive at 2 years vs 59% on fludarabine.

Multivariate analysis revealed only two factors significantly associated with survival: treatment and the number of adverse criteria. Patients who had only one adverse prognostic factor had a very good survival, compared with those with three or more, Dr. Coiffier said.

The CHVP plus interferon regimen appeared to be more toxic: 22 patients stopped interferon, and 8 had a dose reduction because of adverse events, and 26% of CHVP/IFN patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia vs 5% of fludarabine patients. There was no dose-limiting thrombocytopenia.

“The interferon toxicity was more potent than had been described in the GELA 1986 study,” Dr. Coiffier said. But this could have been because the patients in that earlier study were younger. He said that 50% of patients on the current study continued treatment with no problems, and a few had their IFN dosage decreased.

The study confirms the use of CHVP plus interferon as standard treatment of elderly patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma, Dr. Coiffier concluded.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy