CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 12 No. 3 2
Pages: 1  2  
Next
CMF plus tamoxifen vs tamoxifen alone 

Chemotherapy Does Not Add to the Benefits of Tamoxifen in Node-Negative, ER-Positive Older Breast Cancer Patients

March 1, 2003

PITTSBURGH—Long-term follow-up data from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trials of tamoxifen(Drug information on tamoxifen) plus chemotherapy in node-negative, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients suggest that chemotherapy does not add to the benefits of tamoxifen among women aged 60 or older. Bernard Fisher, MD, distinguished service professor at the University of Pittsburgh and past chairman and scientific director of the NSABP, reviewed the results of several trials, beginning with NSABP B-20. That trial established the value of combining cyclophosphamide(Drug information on cyclophosphamide) (Cytoxan, Neosar), methotrexate(Drug information on methotrexate), and fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil) (CMF) with tamoxifen in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive women.

A 5-year follow-up analysis found that breast cancer risk reductions were significantly greater among women treated with CMF plus tamoxifen (CMFT) than among those given tamoxifen alone-46% vs 26%. At that time, the researchers noted that these risk reductions were greater among women age 49 or younger than among those age 50 or older.

Dr. Fisher said that with the more prolonged follow-up time, and in view of issues recently raised about the administration of chemotherapy and tamoxifen, the group had updated their findings and had found them compelling. With a median follow-up of approximately 12 years, the influence of age on chemotherapy benefit has come into sharper focus.

Analyzed by Variables

Among women aged 49 or younger and among those age 50 to 59, CMFT was superior to tamoxifen alone for all study endpoints-disease-free survival, relapse-free survival, distant-disease-free survival, and overall survival. This was not true for women aged 60 or older. In this older group, CMF did not improve upon or negate the findings from tamoxifen alone.

When the investigators analyzed the data according to menopausal status, as reported to the NSABP data center, they found similar results. "Patients designated as premenopausal received a remarkably good benefit from CMF plus tamoxifen," Dr. Fisher said. CMFT offered no advantage over tamoxifen alone among those in the postmenopausal group.

When the treatment benefits were analyzed by age or menopausal status, neither variable affected the benefits of tamoxifen alone. But in the CMFT patients, those who were aged 49 or younger, aged 50 to 59, or premenopausal did much better than did those who were aged 60 or older or who were postmenopausal.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Skin Lesions
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy