CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 14 No. 1
 

Study Supports Need for RT Post-Lumpectomy in Most Pts

January 1, 2005

ATLANTA—A randomized trial finds that most women aged 50 or older who underwent breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer need radiation therapy (RT) in addition to tamoxifen(Drug information on tamoxifen) to minimize the risk of a breast relapse. However, the data also suggest that selected women aged 60 or older may be able to safely skip radiation therapy. Lead author Anthony W. Fyles, MD, a radiation oncologist at the Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada, presented findings of the trial at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (abstract 2). (For a full report, see N Engl J Med 351:963-970, 2004).

Women aged 50 or older were eligible to participate if they had T1 or T2 breast cancer with pathologically negative nodes (clinically negative nodes were allowed in women older than 65) and had undergone lumpectomy or partial mastectomy with clean margins, Dr. Fyles said.

"These patients were stratified on the basis of tumor size (T1 or T2), estrogen-receptor (ER) status, axillary dissection, and participating center (Toronto or British Columbia)," he noted. The patients were assigned to treatment with tamoxifen (20 mg daily for 5 years) with or without radiation therapy (40 Gy to the whole breast plus a boost of 12.5 Gy). The 769 women had a median age of 68 years. Most had small tumors (pT1, 83%), pathologically negative nodes (pN0, 83%), and tumors with a positive or unknown hormone-receptor status (94%), Dr. Fyles said.

With a median follow-up of 5.6 years, the 5-year rate of ipsilateral breast relapse was 4%, but it was markedly higher in the tamoxifen group than in the tamoxifen/RT group—7.7% vs 0.6%; hazard ratio (HR) 8.3; P < .0001. In a multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with the risk of breast relapse were assignment to tamoxifen alone (HR 9.0), T2 tumor (HR 1.7), and negative hormone-receptor status (HR 3.8). "Age was significant only on univariate analysis," he noted, with those data suggesting that patients aged 50 to 59 years had the highest rate of relapse.

In exploratory analyses, radiation appeared to confer little added benefit among patients aged 60 years or older with favorable features (tumor size 1 cm or less and positive receptor status), Dr. Fyles noted. The 5-year rate of breast relapse in this subgroup did not differ significantly between those treated with tamoxifen only and those treated with tamoxifen plus radiation (1.2% vs 0%).

In the entire study group, compared with patients given only tamoxifen, those given the combined treatment had a significantly lower 5-year rate of axillary failure (0.5% vs 2.5%). "This goes along with the fact that we do include some lower axillary nodes in the breast tangents of radiation therapy," Dr. Fyles noted. "And this was true both in those patients who had an axillary dissection and those who did not." The tamoxifen/radiation group also had a significantly higher rate of disease-free survival (91% vs 84%), which included breast relapse as an event. However, the two groups did not differ with respect to rates of distant relapse (approximately 4% in each) and overall survival (93% in each).

Eight-Year Results

"But, of course, 5-year results are not necessarily the whole picture," Dr. Fyles said, noting that based on a small number of patients, rates of relapse seem to be increasing in both groups. The 8-year rate of local relapse was 18% in patients given only tamoxifen and 3.5% in those given tamoxifen plus radiation, a difference that was significant. "This is true even if we take the best risk group from the stratification factors—T1 tumors that were ER positive," he commented.

Patients who were aged 60 or older and had the favorable features had similar 8-year rates of breast relapse whether they received tamoxifen or tamoxifen/radiation (2.8% vs 0%). However, even among patients aged 70 or older with receptor-positive tumors, Dr. Fyles noted, the rate of relapse was markedly higher among those with tumors larger than 1 cm if they did not receive radiation.

"Admittedly, these are exploratory analyses and really should be considered as hypothesis generating. But they do raise some concerns about the inclusion of patients with intermediate-size T1 tumors in any decision about avoiding radiation therapy," he said.

The investigators concluded that adding radiation therapy to tamoxifen reduces the risk of breast relapse in women aged 50 or older with node-negative breast cancer. "A subgroup that we defined as women 60 and older with tumors of 1 cm or less that were ER positive receiving tamoxifen may—if they are well counseled regarding risks and benefits—consider avoiding radiation treatment, depending on their particular circumstances," Dr. Fyles said. "Further follow-up will give us some better data on the long-term rates of breast control as well as the results of long-term breast salvage, given that these patients are also at further risk of breast relapse."


 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Skin Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy