CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 10 No. 2
 

Herceptin Use Postprogression Safe and Potentially Beneficial

February 1, 2001

SAN ANTONIO—Women with metastatic breast cancer who experience disease progression on trastuzumab(Drug information on trastuzumab) (Herceptin) may benefit from continued treatment with the antibody, according to results of a crossover study presented by Debu Tripathy, MD, associate clinical professor of medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine. Moreover, trastuzumab cardiotox-icity was only 2.2% among long-term users.

The study involved a subset of the 469 women enrolled in the randomized Trastuzumab Pivotal Combination Chemotherapy Trial, which compared chemotherapy alone to chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. The crossover study was incorporated into the original trial after trastuzumab’s activity as a single agent became apparent from other studies—and at the urging of the scientific and advocacy communities.

"The other important factor was that we really have no safety or outcome data on patients who are continued on trastuzumab after progressing on tras-tuzumab-containing therapy," Dr. Tripathy noted. "This presents a dilemma for the practicing oncologist who wants to take advantage of some of the synergistic interactions that may exist with other chemotherapy agents, even after progression."

Patients who progressed in the randomized trial were given the option to join the crossover study. Participants were then given, at the discretion of the treating physician, trastuzumab alone or trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapeutic or hormonal agents that would be considered standard of care for metastatic breast cancer.

The chemotherapeutic agents used in the original trial were doxorubicin(Drug information on doxorubicin) or epirubicin(Drug information on epirubicin) (Ellence) plus cyclophosphamide(Drug information on cyclophosphamide) or, for patients who had received anthracycline therapy in the adjuvant setting, paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel) (Taxol).

A total of 247 patients from the randomized trial opted to participate in the crossover study—154 patients from the control (chemotherapy alone) arm and 93 patients from the chemotherapy plus trastuzumab arm.

A significant portion of patients in the crossover study received trastuzumab alone, Dr. Tripathy said. The remaining patients received trastuzumab plus chemotherapeutic agents representative of the community standard for refractory breast cancer. Paclitaxel, vinorelbine (Navelbine), and docetaxel(Drug information on docetaxel) (Taxotere) were the most commonly used agents.

Patients continued on therapy until withdrawn by their physician or through their own choice. Tumor assessments were undertaken when clinically indicated, and responses were judged by the investigators.

Response Rates

Among patients originally given chemotherapy alone in the randomized trial, the crossover to trastuzumab (alone or in combination) yielded a response rate of 14%. The clinical benefit rate (complete response, partial response, or disease stabilization for more than 6 months) in this group was 32%. Response duration was 7.4 months.

In the group of patients who originally received trastuzumab in the randomized trial, the response rate was 11%. In this group, 22% received a clinical benefit from the extended therapy, and response duration was 6.7 months.

"Responses were seen with single-agent Herceptin, including patients who may have received hormonal therapy, and with Herceptin plus paclitaxel, vinorel-bine, and—to a lesser extent—cisplatin [Platinol], docetaxel, and doxorubicin," Dr. Tripathy said.

No clear predictive factors emerged, other than HER-2-neu 3+ overexpression in the group originally assigned to chemotherapy alone, he said. Performance status and the site or number of metastases had no effect. There was, however, a trend toward a greater likelihood of response among patients who had responded in the randomized trial.

"No clear safety signals emerged, which is an important observation here," Dr. Tripathy added. "When you look at severe adverse events, all are less than 15%, and many reflect side effects attributable to chemotherapy or to progression of carcinoma—asthenia, pain, leukopenia.

Among events possibly or probably related to trastuzumab, cardiac events surfaced as a significant factor. The cardiac event rate was 6.5%, half of which were New York Heart Association class III or IV. Among patients already receiving the antibody, however, cardiotoxicity was low—2 out of 93 patients. "Other events, such as infusion reactions, were seen at a very low frequency," Dr. Tripathy said.

The researchers concluded that trastu-zumab may be active in patients who have progressed on a trastuzumab-based therapy and that long-term treatment with the antibody does not seem to increase the risk of cardiotoxicity. The individual contribution of trastuzumab, however, could not be determined from this trial and will need to be addressed in future studies.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy