CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 13 No. 9
 

Temozolomide/RT Effective Against GBM

September 1, 2004

NEW ORLEANS—The chemotherapy drug temozolomide(Drug information on temozolomide) (Temodar) combined with radiation therapy more than doubled the 2-year survival rate in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), compared with radiation alone, according to data presented at the plenary session of the 40th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (abstract 2).

"This is the first study to demonstrate a statistically significant and clinically meaningful survival advantage for chemotherapy in a homogeneous group of glioblastoma patients," said Roger Stupp, MD, attending physician, Multidisciplinary Oncology Center, University of Lausanne Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland. He represented the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups and the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG).

He noted that these phase III findings confirm the efficacy and tolerability results of a prior phase II study (Stupp et al: J Clin Oncol 20:1375-1382, 2002).

Median survival for GBM is less than 1 year after diagnosis, and standard treatment has been surgery followed by radiation therapy. Although PCV chemotherapy (procarbazine [Matulane], lomustine(Drug information on lomustine) [CeeNU], and vincristine) has also been used, clinical trials have not found this regimen to provide a clear survival benefit, Dr. Stupp said. However, in the new study, temozolomide extended median survival by 2.5 months.

In the phase III trial, Dr. Stupp and his colleagues randomized 573 patients into two groups. All were newly diagnosed with GBM and had gone through biopsy or resection no more than 6 weeks previously. One group received the standard therapy for GBM in Europe and Canada: daily radiation therapy of 200 cGy for 30 days, for a total dose of 60 Gy. The other group received the same radiation therapy plus temozolomide. Planned dosage was 75 mg/m2 orally every day, 7 days a week, for 6 to 7 weeks during radiotherapy, then 150 to 200
mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 5 every 28 days for as many as six cycles.

The primary endpoint was overall survival (based on intention to treat). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, quality of life, safety and tolerability, and an economic analysis.

Median overall survival was 14.6 months in the temozolomide group vs 12.1 months in the standard-therapy group. Two-year survival was 26% in the temozolomide group vs 10% in the standard-therapy group. Progression-free survival after 1 year was 27% in the temozolomide group vs 9% in the control group. Progression-free survival after 2 years was 11% and 2%, respectively. "The benefit is consistent in all subgroups of patients," Dr. Stupp said.

The researchers considered the chemotherapy safe and well tolerated. Only 6% of patients in the temozolomide arm dropped out of the study due to toxicity. The standard-therapy group had no grade 3-4 hematological toxicities; the treatment group had a 4% incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia and a 3% incidence of thrombocytopenia. Two thirds of the patients in both arms had fatigue during radiotherapy.

Although temozolomide led to statistically significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, nearly three quarters of the temozolomide-treated patients still died within 2 years. "Further improvement in treating this deadly disease is still necessary," Dr. Stupp said. "This trial has clearly shown that current therapies can impact this disease. This result should encourage patients and physicians alike to participate in innovative and collaborative clinical research."


 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Bladder Cancer Recurrence High, Better Follow-Up Care Needed
  • ASCO: Post-Surgery Surveillance Found Safe in Seminoma
  • Fertility Preservation in Women With Breast Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities
  • Addressing Fertility Concerns in Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer: Will Serial Reserve Screening Help?
  • Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy