CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 13 No. 6
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Stereotactic RT Controls Localized, Low-Grade Gliomas

June 1, 2004

SALT LAKE CITY—When surgery and chemotherapy have failed, stereotactic radiation therapy (RT) provides good local control of small, low-grade gliomas in children for many years, Karen J. Marcus, MD, said at the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 45th Annual Meeting (abstract 120). In the prospective trial, about two thirds of children in whom surgery or chemotherapy had not controlled the disease were alive with no progression 8 years after stereotactic RT.

"The management of low-grade gliomas in children remains controversial, and there are a number of factors that influence treatment, including tumor location, presence of neurofibromatosis, and age of the patient," said Dr. Marcus, assistant professor of radiation oncology (pediatrics), Harvard Medical School.

Dr. Marcus and her colleagues monitored outcomes in 50 children (median age, 9 years) who had localized, low-grade astrocytomas (including optic gliomas) measuring no more than 5 cm and who were treated with stereotactic radiation therapy between 1992 and 1998. The indications for stereotactic radiation therapy were progression after subtotal resection or biopsy (38 patients) and progression after chemotherapy (12 patients).

A 6-MV linear accelerator was used to deliver the radiation. The patients’ heads were positioned with two types of non-invasive relocatable head-frames, a TLC frame for children requiring general anesthesia and the Gill-Thomson-Cosman frame for older children, Dr. Marcus said. In planning the radiation therapy, the investigators fused CT and MRI images to determine the tumor extent, used the preoperative volume as the clinical target volume, and added a 2-mm margin. The patients received a mean total radiation dose of 52.2 Gy (range, 50.4 to 58 Gy) in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy.

Outcomes were assessed over a median follow-up of 7 years (range, 1 to 10 years). Progression-free survival was about 83% at 5 years and 65% at 8 years (Figure 1) and 98% and 82%, respectively, for overall survival (Figure 2).

Six patients had local progression between 15 and 92 months after radiation therapy; in two of these patients, progression was to anaplastic astrocytoma at 3 and 7 years, respectively. "All progressions were within the primary tumor bed, and all patients had received the full prescription dose. There were no failures at or adjacent to the margin," she noted.

Five patients had CNS dissemination of their disease about 1 to 7 years after their radiation therapy; all of these patients had primary hypothalamic/optic system tumors. Two of these five patients remain alive with stable disease, she said.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Skin Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy