CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 6 No. 9
 

Obstacles to Advance Directives May Include Physicians

September 1, 1997

NEW YORK—The majority of people in the United States die without discussing or documenting their wishes regarding end-of-life care. Estimates of the number of people who have actually prepared advance directives range from 5% to 25%, said Sylvia Pearl, LCSW, during a national teleconference sponsored by Cancer Care, Inc.

Apart from procrastination, there are several reasons people give for not filling out advance directives, said Ms. Pearl, a senior social worker at Cancer Care, Inc.

They may feel that family members will make the right decisions for them when the time comes or that they will upset family members by involving them in end-of-life planning. Others worry that advance directives may make it possible for health care providers and family to neglect or abandon them.

Physician Obstacles

The medical profession, Ms. Pearl noted, has made important strides in supporting and participating in end-of-life planning. Nevertheless, physicians can sometimes present obstacles, she said.

Many physicians believe that their patients are the ones who should initiate discussions about end-of-life planning. Yet studies have shown that patients feel that their physicians should bring it up. Patients also feel that a routine medical visit is an appropriate setting for such discussions. In one study, only 15% of respondents reported having discussed living wills with their doctor, although 61% said they had wanted to do so.

Setting Goals in End-of-Life Planning

Too often advance directives focus on the types of treatment people do not want at the end of life and fail to spell out what they do want, Connie Zuckerman, project director, Hospital Palliative Care Initiative, United Hospital Fund, New York, said during the Cancer Care, Inc. teleconference. She outlined three sets of goals for end-of-life planning.

  • Treatment options. People should decide the types of treatment they want at the end of life, and the physical symptoms they want treated. To do this, patients and families should have some understanding of the types of treatments that are available.
  • Quality of life. Patients should prioritize the importance of physical function, mental clarity, and companionship with loved ones.
  • Setting of care. Patients may want to lay out a plan for a continuum of settings, rather than just one scenario.

Physicians may feel that advance directives are unnecessary for young and/or healthy patients and, therefore, may discourage patients from talking about it. But physicians who do believe that end-of-life plans are appropriate for all patients report having more discussions with their patients about it and more patients who complete advance directives.

Family members may also have their own reasons for avoiding end-of-life planning discussions. They may project long-standing feelings or conflicts into the situation that prevent them from bringing it up or discussing it.

Even when end-of-life plans have been completed, they may not be carried out according to the patient’s wishes. The directive must be available, recognized and honored under clinical circum-stances to be implemented, she noted.

Family members may forget to bring directives to the hospital. Admitting staff may neglect to document the status of the directive or do it incorrectly. A hospital may not forward the directive.

Patients, believing they have a treatable illness and assuming their advance directives are only appropriate for terminal illnesses, may not bring them to the hospital. Family members may not realize there is a need to volunteer advance directive information for patients who are incapacitated.

Finally, physicians may not document advance directives because of their own discomfort with the topic or the belief that documentation is unimportant for a patient with an illness the physician presumes is reversible.

Nor does the presence of an advance directive on a patient’s medical chart ensure that the patient’s wishes will be followed, Ms. Pearl said. The physician’s values may prove more decisive than the patient’s values in the end.

Yet, even just the act of formulating these directives may be beneficial to the patient. “It can bring about important uplifting and therapeutic discussions between patients, health care providers, and families about issues that are emotionally and conceptually difficult,” she said.

Completing an advance directive may lower a patient’s anxiety about death and treatment associated with the end of life. Often, patients are proud and relieved that they have taken steps they feel will control their care.

Promoting end-of-life planning and implementation requires a broad-based effort, Ms. Pearl said. Greater efforts need to be made through senior citizen centers, hospitals, and other health care facilities to increase people’s understanding of advance directives and to assist them in completing the forms.

Public education efforts on end-of-life planning also need to be directed at younger segments of the population, and more physicians need to learn how to formulate and implement directives.

Finally, advance directives needs to be integrated into the context of the patient’s life values and experiences (see box). The ultimate aim of advance planning, Ms. Pearl said, is to reduce suffering and promote patient autonomy.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy