CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 8 No. 8
 

Doxil Approved for Refractory Metastatic Ovarian Cancer

August 1, 1999

ROCKVILLE, Md—Doxil (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection, ALZA Corporation) has won accelerated FDA approval of its supplemental New Drug Application for the treatment of metastatic ovarian cancer refractory to both paclitaxel(Drug information on paclitaxel) (Taxol)- and platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. Accelerated approval requires the company to conduct additional research to demonstrate that the drug is associated with clinical benefit. Doxil, a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin(Drug information on doxorubicin), is currently approved for use in AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma.

In its presentation to the Oncology Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) only 3 weeks before approval was granted, ALZA provided data from four studies in support of its application—three phase II trials, two completed and one ongoing, and an ongoing phase III trial.

According to the FDA, study 30-22 (involving 27 eligible patients with refractory ovarian cancer, treated at two US sites) showed a response rate of 22.2%. Study 30-47 (82 eligible patients treated at 18 US sites) produced a response rate of 17.1%. Study 30-47E, still in progress with 52 patients at 14 centers in Europe, found no responses among 36 patients.

Finally, an interim analysis of study 30-49, comparing Doxil with topotecan(Drug information on topotecan) (Hycamtin) in 237 patients at 90 sites in the United States and Europe, showed a Doxil response rate of 13.6% (6 of 44 patients) vs 8.1% (3 of 37) for topotecan.

The combined Doxil response rate for the four studies was 13.8% (26 of 189 patients), according to the FDA. This was slightly lower than the 14.4% rate claimed by the company. Duration of response across the trials was 39.4 weeks, and time to progression was 15.9 weeks, according to ALZA.

At the ODAC meeting, several members expressed puzzlement about the zero response rate in study 30-47E, the ongoing phase II European trial. The company said several factors indicate that patients in that trial may have been sicker, which could account for the nonresponse.

“The sum total of major disease at baseline was somewhat larger, and patients spent a shorter amount of time on trial,” said Edward Schnipper, MD, ALZA’s vice president for Clinical Research. “It appears possible that patients on this trial entered at a later state of their disease and were treated for shorter periods of time than were patient on the other Doxil trials.”

ALZA’s data presentation did not satisfy patient representative Martha Solonche of New York City. “From a patient’s perspective, we’re looking at survival, and I don’t think we have enough data at the moment to see this as a drug that is going to advance treatment in a great way,” Ms. Solonche said.

Two dosage schedules were used in the trials presented by ALZA: every 3 weeks in trial 30-22 and every 4 weeks in the other three. Due to higher toxicity with the every-3-week regimen, ALZA requested that the FDA consider only the every-4-week regimen.

Generally Well Tolerated

In its safety analysis, FDA staff limited its review to study 30-47, which was the one completed study that used the every-4-week schedule. It found the following: hand-foot syndrome, 42%/20% severe; asthenia, 42%/9%; leukopenia, 39%/7%; anemia, 39%/14%; nausea, 38%/7%; neutropenia, 37%/16%; stomatitis, 35%/9%.

“We would submit that Doxil is generally well tolerated,” Ken Cunningham, MD, vice president for European Clinical Research, said in summing up ALZA’s safety presentation. “Hand-foot syndrome is the most common adverse event, and it is manageable, as evidenced by the relatively low number of patients who actually withdrew as a result.”

Stacy R. Nerenstone, MD, of the Gray Cancer Center, Hartford, commended the sponsor “for looking at this patient population, which notoriously has been clinically underrepresented in clinical trials in terms of drug development. I think, for this carefully defined population, the 13% response rate is meaningful.”

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy