CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 6 No. 7
 

Five Years of Tamoxifen Superior to 2-3 Years

July 1, 1997

ASCO--Data from a large multi-center European study has confirmed the superiority of five years of tamoxifen(Drug information on tamoxifen) (Nolvadex) therapy as opposed to two or three years in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. When longer follow-up data are available, the trial will be able to determine whether even longer duration of tamoxifen (12 to 13 years) might provide additonal benefits.

The findings confirm those of a smaller Scottish study reported at the ASCO meeting last year, as well as the findings of other studies in the literature.

This study involved almost 3,800 postmenopausal early breast cancer patients, each of whom had taken tamoxifen for two to three years prior to enrollment in the trial.

The rationale of the trial was based on clinical results as they were known in 1985 when the trial was organized. "Adjuvant tamoxifen is known to result in a significant reduction in the odds of recurrence and mortality in early breast cancer. However, the optimal duration has not been determined and remains controversial," said Dr. Thierry Delozier, of the Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France, in his presentation of the data at the ASCO integrated session on breast cancer.

At randomization, half the patients stopped taking tamoxifen and half continued treatment. The trial was conducted between September 1986 and May 1995.

Because so few events had occurred at 10 years, the protocol was modified in February of this year to discontinue tamoxifen 10 years after randomization. As a result, the trial will compare the impact of two to three years of therapy versus 12 to 13 years (follow-up is complete for 4 to 5 years), Dr. Delozier said.

About two thirds of the patients were node positive, and a similar number was positive for estrogen receptors. About 30% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Tamoxifen dosage ranged from 10 to 70 mg daily. The majority of patients received 20 to 40 mg daily.

Median follow-up in the trial has reached 48 to 49 months for both patient groups. The mean duration of tamoxifen therapy was 30 months in patients who discontinued therapy at randomization and 70 months in the patients who continued hormonal therapy.

Thus far, no difference in overall survival has emerged, as about 80% of patients in both groups remain alive. However, the longer duration of tamoxifen therapy significantly improved five-year disease-free survival, 80% versus 72% (P = .002).

The incidence of endometrial cancer was virtually identical in the two groups, as 13 patients developed the cancer in the short-term tamoxifen group versus 12 in the long-term cohort. Contralateral breast cancer occurred more often in the short-term therapy group, 44 cases versus 27 in patients who continued treatment.

Analysis of the data by different dosages showed an advantage for the long-term therapy group at 30 mg daily but not for 20 mg or 40 mg, the most common doses.

Disease-free survival had an unexpected association with nodal status. Long-term therapy benefited patients who had positive lymph nodes but not those with negative nodes. Dr. Delozier had no explanation for the finding.

The results leave unanswered the question of optimal duration of tamoxifen therapy. "We need further follow-up to assess the value of longer duration of therapy with tamoxifen," he said. "I think the only recommendation we can make at this point is that tamoxifen should be given for at least five years, but the question of whether it should be given for a longer period of time is still open."

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy