CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 11 No. 9
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Pemetrexed/Gemcitabine Promising in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

September 1, 2002

ORLANDO—The combination of pemetrexed(Drug information on pemetrexed) (Alimta) and gemcitabine(Drug information on gemcitabine) (Gemzar) is active in pancreatic cancer with acceptable toxicity and a promising 32% 1-year survival rate, according to an oral presentation at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (abstract 499).

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted anti-folate shown to have activity against pancreatic cancer in phase I and II trials. The combination of pemetrexed with gem-citabine is synergistic in vitro and was broadly active in a phase I study.

In this multicenter phase II trial, previously untreated patients with histologically proven advanced pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine, 1,250 mg/m2 over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle; pemetrexed, 500 mg/m2 over 10 minutes on day 8; and dexamethasone(Drug information on dexamethasone) premedication to prevent rash.

Of 42 patients enrolled from September 1999 through November 2000, 41 were evaluable for response after receiving a total of 213 cycles (range, 1 to 20 per patient; median, 4). Median age was 60 years (range, 34 to 79); 64% of patients were male; 95% had stage IV disease; 12% had received prior fluorouracil(Drug information on fluorouracil). Most patients had a Karnofsky performance status of 80 or 90, and 67% had liver metastases.

"Beginning in December of 1999, folic acid(Drug information on folic acid) and vitamin B12 were also given during a 2- to 7-day lead-in period, since earlier studies showed that these supplements significantly reduce pemetrexed toxicity," said presenter and lead author Hedy L. Kindler, MD, assistant professor of medicine, University of Chicago.

Patients underwent a daily pain assessment and kept an analgesic medication diary; they were seen weekly for history, physical, weight, and performance status, and every 6 weeks they had a CT scan and a CA19-9 test. There were six partial responses for an overall response rate of 12%, and 44% of patients had stable disease. Three additional patients had an unconfirmed partial response. One-year survival was 32%. Median survival was 6.6 months, and median time to progression was 3.1 months.

Clinical benefit analysis was done on 30 patients, and 4 patients (13.3%) achieved a clinical benefit response (a composite of performance status, analgesic consumption, pain intensity, and weight). "It is noteworthy that the patients in this study were less symptomatic at baseline, compared to those in a randomized gemcitabine study, which is why we may have seen a lower clinical benefit response," Dr. Kindler said.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy