CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 11 No. 1
 

Switching to Low-Tar Cigarettes Fails to Reduce Risk of Tobacco-Related Diseases

January 1, 2002

WASHINGTON—Smoking "light" or "ultralight" cigarettes, which are promoted as less hazardous to health than regular brands, does not reduce a person’s risk of developing lung cancer or other tobacco-related diseases, according to a new report from the National Cancer Institute.

"There is no convincing evidence that changes in cigarette design over the last 50 years have reduced the disease burden produced by cigarettes," said David M. Burns, MD, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, the report’s senior scientific editor.

The report finds that people who smoke "low-tar" cigarettes are actually likely to take in as much nicotine(Drug information on nicotine) as smokers who use regular cigarettes. Because the amount of tar inhaled is relatively proportional to the amount of nicotine taken in, the exposure to carcinogens and other harmful chemicals will also equal that of regular-tar cigarettes.

Dr. Burns released the report at a press conference sponsored by four health organizations—the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association (AHA), and American Lung Association.

He also said that the study was unable to determine the health effects on smokers who began with low-tar cigarettes and never used regular cigarettes.

Although lung cancer is the disease most commonly associated with cigarette smoking, AHA chief executive officer M. Cass Wheeler noted that of the more than 400,000 annual US deaths from smoking-related illnesses, nearly half result from cardiovascular disease.

Dr. Burns noted that 87% of cigarettes now sold in the United States are advertised as low in tar. "Clearly, smokers have bought into the illusion of harm reduction and the deception of low-tar cigarettes," he said.

The new study reviewed existing scientific literature and internal tobacco company documents made public as the result of several lawsuits brought by the states. Its findings and conclusion reverse several decades of advice to smokers by public health officials that they switch to cigarettes rated as low in tar and nicotine by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) if they could not stop smoking.

"For decades, we told smokers, if you can’t quit, switch," said Campaign president Matthew L. Myers. "Today, we are telling smokers there is no alternative."

That previous advice was based on early and inadequate studies, according to Dr. Burns, that indicated low-tar products should reduce the risk and mortality from lung cancer.

Moreover, the public health community was slow to recognize two significant factors about low-tar cigarettes. One, people who switch to low-tar cigarettes change their smoking habits to compensate for the reduced nicotine. Two, tobacco companies engineered cigarettes so that smokers could inhale more nicotine- and tar-containing smoke than the machines used by the FTC to test for tobacco tars.

"Smokers smoke for nicotine, and if a cigarette delivers less nicotine, smokers compensate by taking larger puffs, more puffs per cigarette, and smoking more cigarettes per day to get the same nicotine," Dr. Burns said.

Machines are not addicted to nicotine, he added, "a fact the tobacco companies recognized early in their efforts to produce low-tar cigarettes. They worked hard to build into the cigarette an elasticity of delivery that allowed the smoker to receive whatever dose of nicotine he or she wanted from a cigarette, while keeping the machine-measured levels low so the cigarette could be marketed as low-tar, safer cigarettes."

A key technique in re-engineering cigarettes was to strategically place tiny holes in the cigarette filter. When machines puffed cigarettes, the holes resulted in a high dose of air and a low dose of smoke. When actual smokers drew hard, the holes’ design enabled a far higher dose of smoke than air.

"In addition, the holes are placed on the filter exactly where smokers can block them with their lips or their fingers, once again decreasing the amount of air and increasing the amount of smoke," Dr. Burns said. "From the tobacco industry’s perspective, you now have the perfect cigarette, one that could be advertised as delivering less tar while delivering a fully satisfying dose of nicotine.

Copies of Risks Associated With Smoking Cigarettes with Low Machine-Measured Yields of Tar and Nicotine can be obtained by calling 1-800-422-6237 or online at www.cancer.gov/publications.

Neal L. Benowitz, MD, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, served as co-scientific editor of the report. 

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy