CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 13 No. 5
 

Exemestane Bests Tam in Metastatic Breast Cancer

May 1, 2004

HAMBURG, Germany—The steroidal aromatase inactivator exemestane(Drug information on exemestane) (Aromasin) is safe and provides superior progression-free survival, compared with tamoxifen(Drug information on tamoxifen), in the treatment of postmenopausal woman diagnosed with hormone-responsive metastatic breast cancer, according to the first head-to-head front-line phase III trial comparing the two agents. Robert Paridaens, MD, of the University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium, presented the findings at the 4th European Breast Cancer Conference (abstract 241).

The EORTC’s (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) Specialized Breast Group initiated the randomized, open-label, phase II-III trial in 1996. The trial aimed to further document the safety profile of exemestane and to determine if exemestane-treated patients had at least a 3-month increase in progression-free survival over tamoxifen. "This trial was initiated as a phase II study with the possibility of extending to phase III if results were promising," Dr. Paridaens said.

Patients with measurable disease were enrolled in the trial if they had not received hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer and had either a hormone-receptor-positive cancer or an unknown status with a long disease-free period. Patients were randomized to exemestane 25 mg daily or tamoxifen 20 mg daily.

The results of the initial phase II study, which included 122 patients, showed a promising overall response rate, clinical benefits rate, and response duration favoring exemestane. Furthermore, serious toxicity was low, and exemestane was generally well tolerated, with no adverse effects on the lipid profile. As a result, the investigators decided to extend the study to phase III. Between October 1996 and July 2002, 382 patients from 81 institutions in 25 countries were recruited to participate in the phase III trial.

Data analysis showed a median progression-free survival for patients taking exemestane of 9.95 months, compared with 5.72 months for those on tamoxifen.

Response rates were also higher in the exemestane arm: 7.4% complete response (14 patients) and 36.8% partial response (71 patients) for exemestane, compared with 2.6% (5 patients) and 26.6% (52 patients), respectively, for tamoxifen. Dr. Paridaens said that regardless of the site of the metastasis, the investigators generally saw more responses in patients taking exemestane than in those taking tamoxifen.

To date, 284 (74%) of the participating patients have experienced disease progression or have died. The investigators are currently assessing the trial data further, and the complete overall survival data will be released later this year.

"The main endpoint of treatment in advanced disease is control of symptoms—in other words, progression-free survival with the fewest possible adverse effects because maintaining quality of life in incurable disease is essential," Dr. Paridaens said. He noted that both aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen are often associated with hot flushes and menopausal symptoms.

Further, women taking aromatase inhibitors often complain about joint and muscular aches. However, the aromatase inhibitors are less likely than tamoxifen to be associated with thromboembolic events, and, unlike tamoxifen, they are not associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer.

According to Dr. Paridaens, one interesting finding emerging from this study is the lack of adverse effects on the patients’ lipid profile with exemestane. "This contrasts with results seen in studies of nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors," he said. "Whether this will translate into greater long-term cardiovascular safety or whether it is an indication for use of exemestane in woman with abnormal lipid measurements needs to be demonstrated in future clinical studies."

Based on the study outcomes, the investigators concluded that exemestane is a good choice for first-line treatment in hormone-responsive metastatic breast cancer. Further, Dr. Paridaens said, its safety profile makes it an attractive option for adjuvant therapy or to prevent breast cancer in high-risk women.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy