CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 11 No. 7 4
Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Erythropoietic Therapy Does Not Interfere With Response to Imatinib in CML Patients

July 1, 2002

PORTLAND, Oregon—Giving erythropoietic therapy to chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients does not appear to interfere with their response to imatinib(Drug information on imatinib) mesylate (STI571, Gleevec) therapy, according to a retrospective study of 37 patients treated in the Leukemia Center at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland (ASCO abstract 106).

Michael J. Mauro, MD, and his colleagues reported that 58% of the patients responded to erythropoietic therapy with rises in hemoglobin counts of 2 g/dL or more. The study group also had treatment response rates in line with previous phase I and phase II trials of imatinib in CML patients. Among the chronic-phase patients treated with erythropoietic therapy, 44% had a major cytogenetic response, including 19% who had a complete cytogenetic response.

The 19 patients with accelerated-phase disease caused the most concern, according to Dr. Mauro. Yet these patients had the best responses to erythropoietin(Drug information on erythropoietin) therapy (68%) and to imatinib. Nearly half (47%) achieved a major cytogenetic responses, including 37% who had a complete cytogenetic response. One of two patients with blast crisis responded to erythropoietic therapy, but neither responded to imatinib.

"The numbers are still fairly small, but it’s encouraging," Dr. Mauro told ONI, suggesting that erythropoietic therapy might allow advanced CML patients to receive more intensive therapy with imatinib, an ABL-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. At the time the patients received erythropoietic therapy, the mean dose of imatinib was 546 mg, reflecting the large proportion of accelerated-phase patients in the trial.

Anemia Is Common Problem

Anemia is a common problem for CML patients receiving imatinib, especially in the accelerated and blast phases of disease, according to Dr. Mauro. In previous trials, between 29% and 77% of these patients developed grade 3 or grade 4 anemia. Though the condition was nowhere as widespread in chronic-phase patients treated with imatinib, previous studies have also characterized anemia as a poor prognostic factor at any phase for any patient receiving imatinib therapy for CML.

Among the concerns about adding erythropoietin to imatinib was the possibility that the disease affects erythropoietic receptors. Another was the possibility that the growth factor would send growth or survival signals to malignant blood cells. Dr. Mauro and his coauthors theorized, however, that erythropoietic therapy would support nonmalignant erythropoiesis.

Pages: 1  2  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy