CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 9 No. 10
 

Pain Monitoring Program Raises Nurses’ Pain Knowledge

October 1, 2000

AMSTERDAM—A pain monitoring program for nurses implemented at three Dutch hospitals not only raised the nurses’ knowledge of pain and its treatment but also led to improvements in nurses’ attention to patients’ pain complaints.

The key to the program was its inclusion of a twice-daily pain assessment by nurses, using a numeric rating scale, in addition to a 3-hour educational program about pain management and the use of the assessment tool, said Marlies E.J. de Rond, RN, MS, of The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, and her colleagues.

Just before the start of the pain monitoring program and 6 months after, nurses completed a questionnaire regarding their pain knowledge (eight items) and attitudes (nine items).

At pretest, a majority of the nurses said they had received little or no training in pain management during their basic nursing education. Only 31.4% indicated they had taken any courses that included information on pain management after their basic education.

The pretest analysis included 175 nurses, and the post-test analysis involved 144 nurses. After the educational intervention, the mean score on the knowledge test improved from 69.1% to 75.8% (P < .001) (J Pain Symptom Manage 19:457-467, 2000). Analysis of individual items on the knowledge test showed significant improvements on several important items (see Table).

“A 7% increase on the knowledge test may seem rather moderate,” the authors said, “ but it should be noted that summary scores of 8 items can be misleading. On important issues [shown in the table], there was a substantial increase in knowledge.”

The attitudes test showed that “more nurses felt they had sufficient knowledge and skills to relieve pain” after the intervention, the authors said. At pretest, 78% of the nurses said they felt that nurses pay enough attention to patients’ complaints of pain. Six months after completion of the program, 85% agreed with the statement (P < .05).

Analysis of the pretest scores showed that age and additional pain courses were significant predictors of pain knowledge.

The authors noted that previous work by De Wit et al (Pain 73:55-69, 1997) showed that cancer patients with chronic pain and nurses tend to score lowest on the same items (“Giving the lowest amount of medicine possible,” “patients are often overmedicated,” “psychological addiction is inevitable over time”) and highest on the same item (“treatments other than medications can be effective”).

“Because patients and nurses have the same deficits in knowledge, educating nurses is very important in order to address misconceptions and myths about pain management,” the Dutch researchers pointed out.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy