CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 6 No. 7
 

Repeat Biopsies May Improve the Reliability of Gleason Scores

July 1, 1997

NEW ORLEANS--Repeat biopsies enhance detection and improve the reliability of Gleason grading in the evaluation of prostate cancer, according to two reports from the American Urological Association annual meeting.

A Memorial-Sloan Kettering study found that re-biopsy substantially improved the accuracy of Gleason grading. The investigators had previously shown a discordance between Gleason grading from prostate needle biopsy specimens versus the actual pathologic grade at radical prostatectomy. "Of most concern is that a substantial proportion of patients with Gleason 6 or less from biopsy actually have Gleason 7 or more," Neil Fleshner, MD, MPH, reported.

The researchers explored the issue in a group of 51 control subjects from their neoadjuvant androgen deprivation protocol who had undergone two separate prostate needle biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy. Their highest Gleason scores were compared with those of a concurrent group of 226 patients who had only one set of biopsies.

In the single-biopsy group, 165 patients had biopsy Gleason grade 6 or less, but 63 of these (38%) had a final pathologic grade of 7 or more. In patients who had two biopsies, 37 had biopsy Gleason grade 6 or less, and only 7 (19%) had a final grade of 7 or more.

They concluded that prostate re-biopsy minimizes the unreliability of biopsy-derived grade and should be considered for patients in whom watchful waiting or nomogram-based therapy is selected.

A separate study from Milan, Italy, suggests that a single biopsy per sextant is insufficient for the majority of prostates evaluated after elevated PSA and normal DRE, and that the number of biopsies should be based on prostate weight. Dr. Luciano Nava and colleagues randomized 120 patients (with PSA over 4 ng/mL and normal DRE) to receive either one, two, or three transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies per sextant.

The number of cancer diagnoses and positive biopsies was significantly greater in patients having three biopsies per sextant (18 total) vs those having one biopsy per sextant (6 total) or even two (12).

Prostate cancer was detected in 32% of patients in the three-biopsy group, 17% in the two-biopsy group, and 15% in the single-biopsy group. The samples were positive in 31%, 25%, and 22% of patients, respectively.

When prebiopsy PSA, age, and prostate weight were correlated with the diagnosis of cancer via a multivariate analysis, only prostate weight was significantly associated. Based on these results, Dr. Nava suggested that prostates weighing less than 40 g would require 12 biopsies for accurate diagnosis; those weighing more than 40 g would need 18 biopsies.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Five Steps to Improving Patient Access
Judy Capko,  May 21, 2013
Patient access is getting increased attention through reform initiatives. Here are five steps you can take to make sure patients get appropriate access to care in your office.
Growing HIPAA Threat – Ignore Windows XP at Your Own Peril
Marion K. Jenkins,  May 21, 2013
Chances are good that you have some major ticking software time bombs lurking in your medical practice's computer environment, namely Windows XP and Server 2003.
Finding Physician Work-Life Balance in the Small Moments
Jennifer Frank, MD,  May 21, 2013
At my practice and at home, things are always busy. There's laundry or homework, or a patient with needs.
Three Areas to Reduce Costs at Your Medical Practice
Greg Mertz,  May 19, 2013
By taking a hard look at reducing costs for staffing, overhead, and technology at your medical practice, you may see increased physician compensation.
Dos and Don’ts for Starting a Physician Blog
Michael Woo-Ming, MD,  May 18, 2013
Starting a physician blog can provide your medical practice with marketing benefits, but it's important to do it right.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Therapy Innovations
  • A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy