CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 10 No. 7
 

Thermal Imaging May Be an Adjunct to Mammography

July 1, 2001

SEATTLE—When used as an adjunct to mammography and clinical breast examinations, thermal imaging may help reduce the number of unnecessary breast biopsies, according to Karleen Callahan, PhD, director of Clinical Research for Breast Cancer at Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc (CTI).

Dr. Callahan presented an exhibit about the CTI Breast Cancer System 2100 (BCS 2100), an investigational thermal imaging device, at the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS).

Dr. Callahan and her colleagues are analyzing the results of a 3½-year clinical study of the efficacy of the BCS 2100 as an adjunctive breast imaging modality in the diagnostic setting. In this multicenter study, thermal imaging was performed before biopsy in more than 2,100 women who had been referred for biopsy because of mammographic findings and/or palpable findings.

The findings are likely to be particularly meaningful because the patient population included women of a wide range of ages and ethnicities. "Our clinical study pretty well reflects the demographics of the country," Dr. Callahan said.

Thermal imaging provides physiologic information about suspicious areas of the breast. The physiologic basis for thermal imaging for cancer detection is the difference in infrared emissions of normal and malignant tissues upon cooling. This difference results, in turn, from differences in angiogenesis, vascular reactivity, the release of vasoactive mediators, and metabolic activity.

Efforts to harness thermal disparities for breast cancer detection date back to at least the 1970s, Dr. Callahan said. But that older technology (called thermography) had limitations and did not prove effective when used for breast cancer screening. The key changes have been an increase in the camera sensitivity, the collection of data over a period of several minutes, the addition of a cooling challenge, and the development of a sophisticated computer model for analyzing the data. "We think that all of the improvements will make thermal imaging a viable technique," she said.

A patient undergoing thermal imaging lies prone on the patented BCS 2100 imaging table, and thermal data are collected from each breast over a 3-minute period that includes a cooling challenge (a stream of cold air blown over the breast).

The radiologist identifies the region of interest from the mammogram or the clinical breast exam and uses this region of interest to localize the lesion on the thermal image. A proprietary algorithm analyzes unique spatial and temporal characteristics in the data to generate a likelihood of malignancy score for the lesion (see Figure).

Patient acceptance of the BCS 2100 has been very good, Dr. Callahan said. "It’s not an uncomfortable procedure. There’s no breast compression, and it’s not invasive—no contrast dyes and no radiation," she said. The entire exam takes only about 10 minutes.

Unblinding of the data from the clinical study should provide detailed information about the performance of the BCS 2100, Dr. Callahan said. For example, the data will help determine how effective the BCS 2100 is for detecting specific types of malignancies, how well it discriminates between malignant and benign neoplasms, and how well it performs for superficial vs deep lesions.

Thermal imaging may be particularly useful in women with lesions that are probably benign (BI-RADS 3) or suspicious (BI-RADS 4) on mammography, Dr. Callahan noted. "Right now, these patients often go to biopsy. And yet, about 80% of the biopsies turn out to be benign," she said. "Thermal imaging would provide further information to the doctor and the patient as to whether they might want to proceed to biopsy or possibly go to short-term follow-up."

To obtain premarket approval (PMA) of the BCS 2100, the company is using the FDA’s modular approach, which divides the application into five modules, each containing a portion of the total data required. The FDA has accepted four modules for the BCS 2100, and the final module was submitted last month.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy