CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 7 No. 7
 

Oncologists Warn of Threats to Progress in Childhood Cancer

July 1, 1998

WASHINGTON--Two pediatric oncologists brought a plea to Capitol Hill that Congress pay greater attention to childhood cancers, both in terms of research funding and guaranteeing access to quality care.

"From time to time, and for many reasons, we have declared war on cancer--breast, prostate, colon. It’s time to declare war on childhood cancer," said G. Denman Hammond, MD, associate vice president for health affairs, University of Southern California, and president of the National Childhood Cancer Foundation.

One in every 333 persons in the United States develops cancer before age 20, he said. Childhood cancers have been increasing at about 1% per year for the last quarter century, although the mortality rate has steadily declined. Nonetheless, Dr. Hammond said, "cancer still kills more children than any other disease."

Nearly 11,000 US children and teens will be diagnosed with cancer this year (Figure 1), added Gregory H. Reaman, MD, chairman of hematology and oncology, Children’s National Medical Center, and professor of pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences. The fact that fewer than 3,000 will die is a tribute to the "coordinated research efforts over the past several decades," he said.

Three decades ago, less than 20% of children and adolescents diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and treated in leading pediatric cancer centers survived 5 years. Today, more than 80% of these patients are cured (Figure 2). However, he said, this record of success, coupled with the relatively low incidence of cancer in children (about 3%), has yielded an unfortunate downside.

"There has been somewhat of a political and social de-emphasis on childhood cancer that has plagued pediatric cancer specialists and investigators for years," said Dr. Reaman, who also serves as vice chair of the Children’s Cancer Group, one of the two collaborative research efforts in childhood cancers.

He and Dr. Hammond spoke at a congressional briefing sponsored by the National Coalition for Cancer Research. It drew several members of Congress who have had a child treated for cancer, as well as key House and Senate staff working on cancer issues. "We are emphasizing two things," Dr. Hammond said. "More research funding is needed, and access to quality care must be preserved and insured. Researchers right now are working in this battle against cancer with one arm tied behind their backs."

Extraordinary opportunities exist for advances in childhood cancers in cancer genetics, genetic epidemiology, development of animal models, imaging technologies and diagnostics, and in developing new anticancer agents, Dr. Reaman said. "These occur at a time when the stability of our pediatric cancer research enterprise is threatened by federal funding cutbacks; by diminished private sector foundation grant support; and by changes in payment, philosophies, and systems in the health care industry."

He noted that only about 2% of the total National Cancer Program funds are devoted to battling childhood cancers. Moreover, in the last two competitive grant applications, budgets awarded the Children’s Cancer Group for each of these 5-year periods was less than half that recommended by an NCI peer review panel.

Both physicians warned that policies of many managed care organizations threaten both research and care. Previously, academic medical centers provided pediatric cancer researchers and treatment programs with support to cover the research personnel, administrative, and regulatory costs associated with clinical research. But this support has been seriously eroded by significant reductions in reimbursement imposed by managed care plans, Dr. Reaman said.

Dr. Hammond stressed that the remarkable successes in treating childhood cancers have occurred at specialized centers, and are not matched in children treated in community hospitals. "Children with cancer require treatment by specialists in the management of cancer in children," he said.

But managed care, as it is now administered, threatens the progress made in both research and treating children with cancer, Dr. Hammond warned. "Children are not always referred to these institutions where they can be cured," he said. "They are being referred to institutions that have not developed multidisciplinary teams."

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Soluble HER2 Levels Prognostic Factor in HER2+ Breast Cancer
  • ASCO: PD-L1 Antibody Elicits Durable Response in RCC
  • RECORD-3: Sunitinib Still Standard First-Line Treatment in Metastatic RCC
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy