CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 8 No. 8
 

Prevention Trial: Many Volunteer, Few Eligible

August 1, 1999

ORLANDO—Persons genetically at risk for colon cancer appear enthusiastic about participating in prevention trials, but researchers at Johns Hopkins had to recruit a large number of potential participants over a span of 2 years to find 41 people who qualified for their study and were willing to enroll, Linda Hylind, RN, said at Digestive Disease Week.

Starting in 1993, the Johns Hopkins researchers contacted 426 people in 37 states who were related to patients in the Hopkins familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) registry. Of these 426 individuals, 201 (47%) said they were willing to join the study (“acceptors”), and 41 (10% of the initial group of 426) qualified for and ultimately enrolled in the study. To qualify, the person had to have both the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene and a colon free of polyps.

“The acceptors are highly motivated,” Ms. Hylind said. “Often they have watched a relative in his 30s or 40s die of colon cancer. The process of recruitment took about 2 years, and it involved many long telephone conversations.” The researchers engaged in a mean of 4.7 phone conversations with acceptors before enrollment and a mean of 6.1 phone calls with nonacceptors.

The distance between the research center and the person’s home did not prove a significant barrier. Acceptors lived an average 423 miles away, while nonac-ceptors lived 437 miles away. Race did prove a significant factor in study participation. Family members from 2 of 10 (20%) black families in the registry accepted participation vs 80 of 126 (63%) white families (P < .05).

The randomized, controlled, double-blind study offers genetic screening and sigmoidoscopy to all participants and randomization to an NSAID (sulindac) or placebo. Every 4 months, the researchers perform flexible sigmoidoscopy and draw blood for testing.

If polyps develop and become too large or too numerous, the participant is removed from the study and is referred to his or her local gastroenterologist for recommendations and continued management of the disease, or for consultation for surgery. “We will complete and publish this research within about a year,” Ms. Hylind said.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy