CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » NEWS

Oncology NEWS International. Vol. 11 No. 4
Pages: 1  2  3  
Next
 

PSA Below 9 ng/mL Triggers Unnecessary Biopsies

April 1, 2002

STANFORD, Calif—Attempts to reduce prostate cancer mortality by ordering biopsies at ever-lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are driving up health care costs and subjecting thousands of men to early prostatectomies they could safely defer for years, according to researchers at Stanford University Medical Center.

Now, a large study has correlated serum PSA levels with subsequent quantitative histology of the cancer in radical prostatectomies at 1 ng/mL intervals of preoperative PSA. Thomas A. Stamey, MD, and his colleagues found that PSA levels between 2 and 9 ng/mL provide no reliable predictive information about prostate cancer and are principally the result of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). This study was published in the Journal of Urology (167:103-111, 2002).

The purpose of the study was to determine whether preoperative PSA levels correlated with any of a number of morphological variables known to affect cure rates from radical prostatectomy.

"We are overdiagnosing prostate cancer at a huge rate," said Dr. Stamey, professor of urology, Stanford University. He suggests that physicians may wish to avoid biopsy at PSA levels lower than 4 ng/mL. He thinks that biopsy can be delayed safely for a few years to confirm a PSA rise from 4 ng/mL into the 7 ng/mL range, and that prostatectomy can be delayed for years in men whose PSA is in the 2 to 4 ng/mL range and whose prostate is larger than 30 g.

Prostate cancer is a ubiquitous cancer of aging that starts in the 20s and increases in prevalence in every decade, from 8% in men age 20 to 30 to 80% in those age 70 to 80, Dr. Stamey said. "If you look for cancer with enough biopsies in men over age 50, you will often find it. However, few men die of the disease," he said. The SEER data show that the annual prostate cancer death rate in men over age 65 is 0.23% (226/100,000).

"We all thought there was a relationship between a PSA of 2 to 9 ng/mL and prostate cancer, but there is not. The cancers detected in biopsies of men at those levels is due to serendipity," he said.

Since 1983, Dr. Stamey and pathologist John E. McNeal, MD, have sectioned every prostate removed at Stanford into 3 mm step sections and quantified the percent of Gleason grade 4 or 5 tumors, volume of grade 4 or 5 tumors, volume of the largest tumor, percent of tumors smaller than 0.5 mL, percent with capsular penetration, percent with positive surgical margins, percent with positive lymph nodes, percent with positive seminal vesicles, percent with cancer confined to the organ, percent with transitional zone involvement, prostate weight, patient age, and percent of tumors that were stage T1c-T2c.

Pages: 1  2  3  
Next
 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Skin Lesions
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


CancerNetwork on Facebook


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy