CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » EHR

 

Lack of Internet Regulations Hurting Medical Practices

By Simon Sikorski, MD | September 17, 2012

Internet companies have launched an all-out assault on the medical practice industry. From SEO companies to health information sites to physician ratings websites, they’re all competing for the same thing — a physician’s name.

Whether it’s lack of physicians’ interest in their online reputations, lack of knowledge of what should be on page one of Google, or the lack of regulations in the space of medical marketing, all three issues have led to some of the most unethical practices in the industry.

(MORE: 10 New Social Media Tips for Physicians)

Because of lack of regulations, even lawsuits against Internet companies have resulted in nothing. Because of the failed lawsuits, more companies with unethical practices are springing up. Upon review of the last lawsuits in the industry, it was very clear that neither the lawyers, the doctors themselves, nor possibly the judges/jury were even remotely aware of why these Internet companies’ practices were unethical.

Here are the top five most unethical practices to watch out for online:

Use of doctors' names in advertising campaigns without their knowledge or consent

If a website is listing your name or the brand of your practice on their physician locator is it justified? Every time this happens, the Internet company utilizes the fact that patients Google their doctors, and they attract attention to their websites and advertisers by enticing people to view information about you. When they get on the website, there is no information about you, but rather advertisements of other doctors who pay the company for patient lead generation. This is the most common unethical practice used by most Internet companies and it’s rampant. From health information sites that use physician locators with propagated ratings, to physician review sites, to physician directories, to SEO companies, they’re all competing to entice more advertisers at your expense.

Use of physician reputations for monetization schemes

It’s without doubt that patients go online to run a background check on their doctors. But are three random physician reviews from the past five years representative of the thousands of patients you see? Well, imagine if a doctor who has two negative or so-so patient reviews pitched against an advertisement of another doctor. Without doubt, patients do not want to go to a poorly-reviewed doctor. They will click on that advertisement. So while possible patients are going to review information about you they’re fooled into going to see another doctor. Again, this is a standard practice among Internet companies that uses doctors’ names to improve advertisers’ results.

Manipulation of public services for profit

Recently many doctors have been affected by patient review and ratings websites that manipulate physician reviews. Many patient reviews are hidden behind filters to make the doctors look worse. Doctors are displayed with awful ratings for their medical schools, hospitals, and training. Then these same doctors are called by the companies to advertise with them, create custom profiles, and remove negative ratings from public view.

SEO (search engine optimization) services for “page one Google results”

The only way to achieve page one of Google is to advertise using Google Ads. Many SEO companies claim to boost your rankings for your website on Google by tweaking your content and building links. At the end of the month they will put together an ad, will call you to review it, and then claim that they brought your website to “#1 Result on Google” Once you review it and have a smile on your face, they get you with an annual contract. The next day they remove the advertisements. If you want page one on Google to list the most important information about you, you need to be proactive. There’s no magical service that will fix this. What good is SEO for your website if the next listing on Google is a bad patient review?

Google advertisements without reputation control and website tweaks

There are now many Internet companies switching from other industries to focus on doctors to offer Google Ads as stand-alone services for several thousand dollars a month. They mostly prey on physicians in surgical specialties who can afford such ads. What they don’t tell you is that if you were to tweak your website and your reputation online was improved, the cost of Google Ads can decrease by a few thousand dollars. Don’t get sucked into getting one or two patients from Google Ads. Internet advertising has to part of a marketing plan. Alone it’s simply a very costly waste of money.

To summarize, doctors need to be aware of their online reputations. The practice of using doctors’ names and reputations are not a public service if there is no service, but rather an unethical monetization scheme. Be careful of who uses your name for their profit. And remember that Internet marketing is not about SEO or Google Ads. Internet marketing is about everything that appears on page one of Google.

Find out more about Simon Sikorski and our other Practice Notes bloggers.
 

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

Read more from Simon Sikorski

Google Ads and Physicians: Get the Most for Your Money

Five Hackers After Your Medical Practice Marketing

Five Important Topics for Your Physician Blog

Attracting More Cash Paying Patients to Your Medical Practice

Online Physician Ratings: Know What's Being Said About You

How Physicians Can Improve Their Medical Blogging

Physician Reputations and Review Websites: Who Owns Your Name?

Lack of Internet Regulations Hurting Medical Practices

10 New Social Media Tips for Physicians





CancerNetwork on Facebook


 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Primary Care Can't Thrive Without Nurse Practitioners
Courtney H. Lyder, ND,  May 17, 2013
With a projected shortfall of primary-care physicians, it's time for alternate solutions to patient care. Nurse practitioners are one logical remedy.
VWhat Physicians Can Learn from the Allscripts EHR Lawsuit
Marisa Torrieri,  May 16, 2013
Lawsuit prompts question: What should physicians do to ensure they end up with a great EHR instead of buyer’s remorse?
Eight Ways ICD-9 Will Still Matter to Medical Practices
Brenda Edwards, CPC,  May 15, 2013
What should your medical practice do with your ICD-9-CM book after October 1, 2014? Keep it.
Seven Ways Technology Can Speed Up Patient Collections
Cheyenne Brinson,  May 15, 2013
Failing to adopt widely available billing and collections technology can cost medical practices big. Here's how to do it right.
Four Reasons Private Medical Practice is Becoming Extinct
Carol Stryker,  May 15, 2013
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for private medical practices to thrive. Here’s what’s driving the trend toward consolidation.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • The ABCDEs of Moles and Melanomas
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on EHR
Evidence on EHR
Guidelines on EHR
Patient Education on EHR
Clinical Trials on EHR
Practical Articles on EHR
Research and Reviews on EHR
All "EHR" results


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy