CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » EHR

 

Five Hackers After Your Medical Practice Marketing

By Simon Sikorski, MD | September 24, 2012

In our previous articles on medical marketing we talked about the importance of setting up your websites, blogs, Internet ads, and managing your online reputations. This week, we’ll be talking about how to effectively protect all of your investments and hard work by watching out for these five major hackers.

1. Online health companies that have physician locators, rewards for doctors to “claim their profiles,” and offering “badges” so that you share your websites, blogs, Twitter, and Facebook with them. By offering up your online properties, you’re introducing another competitor into the mix — advertisers that these companies are directing their visitors to, using your credentials. So when patients come to check out information about you and your practice, they’re most likely directed to your competitors or resources that compete with your own information. The worst problem is that by using your credentials they’re gaining popularity and credibility. These companies will set up doctor profiles which are indexable by Google and effectively establish another listing on the Internet for your name and your practice. They will scan your Tweets, websites, blogs, and everything else you’re sharing and make copies. Then they proceed to re-publish everything under their own brand. Once published, online health companies put up highly-targeted advertisements from medical companies — on everything you just shared.

(MORE: 10 New Social Media Tips for Physicians)

2. Search Engine Optimization (SEO) companies. They are more than happy to use your name, practice, and personal information to develop an online presence for you. They will sell you on everything because who are we kidding… stroking physicians' egos is a business all by itself. SEO companies will never educate you and will never share how they do business. Most SEO companies still use black hat tactics (deemed “illegal” by Google and other search engines).

3. Physician Directories. These are companies that prey on doctors who do not have an Internet presence and physicians who do not understand that just having a website is not effective by itself. Everybody knows that a website alone is like having an office in the middle of a forest. Unless you’re talking about it, sharing it, welcoming people on it, providing directions to it, etc., what’s the point of having an online office?

4. Online ratings companies. There is no public service on ratings sites. The reason why so many of these ratings sites have prevailed over doctors who sue them is because the legal system is set up to protect the masses. One doctor speaking up or trying to fight a giant with hundreds of millions of investors’ money is not going to make a dent. The only way to fight these giants is by teaming up together to expose their unethical practices. There will not be any Internet regulations any time soon, so the only way to fight it is to establish your own online presence.

5. Website Companies. Again, a website alone is not effective. A majority of physician websites are lacking even the most basic set up of how these sites are indexed by Google. While you’re getting a flashy, gorgeous, website if you’re still getting less than 10 visitors a day you should be very concerned. Ask these website companies to share Google Analytics data with you every 30 days. There’s only one way of finding out if your website works — review the work.

Establish your own online presence or face the alternative: somebody else will do it without your knowledge. Doctors should care about it, because whatever is developed online now will be their reputation for the next decade or more. We are in the age of digital media, and it’s only going to get more advanced. Having a well-developed website is already considered a dinosaur. The comet of social media already came and impacted the entire medical world as we know it. Now the only way to survive is to adapt and evolve, or face extinction to Dr. Google.

Find out more about Simon Sikorski and our other Practice Notes bloggers.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Simon S | September 26, 2012 9:54 AM EDT

The word "most" was in reference to SEO companies who solely and exclusively do SEO.

As far as physician directories Michael, here's an idea to ponder. If you were to help doctors control all 10 results on the first page of Google would there be need for physician directories?

Physician directories will never be able to prioritize one doctor over the other unless you're paying them premium fees (and hence the growing business of preying on doctors). They're in the business of representing hundreds of doctors on their own sites. Once critical mass is achieved, the only way to be displayed higher on the physician directories is to pay higher fees than everyone else. That's not fair.

Only the first page of Google counts. If physicians want to control page 1 they need to get their own personal results on there: website, blog, facebook, twitter, linkedin, google+, a publication or two, maybe even one or two physician ratings sites that he/she adopted for the use by his/her patients. Is there need to pay a few hundred dollars a month for something extra to be there?

Why pay for something that's not going to be exclusively for them? Why dilute the doctor's image or the practice's brand with results that can potentially direct future patients away from them.

Remember, finding a great doctor who is an expert is a long process for many patients. Don't make it easier for other doctors to be found who simply pay money to advertise without actually being experts in a sub-specialty.

by Michael Allen | September 24, 2012 8:24 PM EDT

Simon,
I typically love your articles and they help me to add even more value to physicians. However, this one seems to lean very far towards scare tactics. Some companies certainly use "black hat"but I find it hard to believe that "Most" do. It's also hard to say that physician directory sites "prey" on doctors. Directory sites target many verticals, use SEO to rank their sites, then offer ads or premium listings. The basic directory listings on these sites won't do anything worse then serve as one more place for physicians to be listed and may even create some extra backlinks. For #4 and #5, I agree completely.

Read more from Simon Sikorski

Google Ads and Physicians: Get the Most for Your Money

Five Hackers After Your Medical Practice Marketing

Five Important Topics for Your Physician Blog

Attracting More Cash Paying Patients to Your Medical Practice

Online Physician Ratings: Know What's Being Said About You

How Physicians Can Improve Their Medical Blogging

Physician Reputations and Review Websites: Who Owns Your Name?

Lack of Internet Regulations Hurting Medical Practices

10 New Social Media Tips for Physicians





CancerNetwork on Facebook


 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
   SEARCH MEDICA RX
   Browse drugs by name:
A B C D E F G H I J
K L M N O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z All      
   Search for drugs:
Search

 

 
FROM PHYSICIANS PRACTICE
Key Differences between FQHCs and RHCs
Chastity Werner, RHIT, June 13, 2013
FQHCs and RHCs take up a unique niche among physician practices. And that affects compensation and billing.
Improving Care Coordination in Your Practice
Susanne Madden,  June 12, 2013
Practices are feverishly working to control the rising costs of healthcare - effective care coordination can help.
Refunding Overpayments: Two Options for Medical Practices
Ericka L. Adler,  June 12, 2013
Medicare and Medicaid providers must return overpayments once identified. Here are two different refund approaches for practices to consider when necessary.
Four Easy Ways to Boost Patient Time of Service Collections
Aubrey Westgate,  June 12, 2013
Simple ways your medical practice staff can increase the likelihood patients will pay when presenting for appointments.
iPad Alternatives for Mobile Physicians
Marisa Torrieri, June 11, 2013
As more physicians are seeing the merits of media tablets, the market is expanding, too.
 

 

 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Who Is Benefiting?
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • A 48-Year-Old Woman With Irregular Vaginal Bleeding
  • Cannabis Linked to Decreased Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • ASCO: Long-Term Tamoxifen Benefit for Breast Cancer Confirmed
  • ASCO: Dabrafenib Shows Activity in BRAF-Mutated NSCLC Patients
  • Preventing Burnout in Oncology
  • ASCO: Yoga Reduces Insomnia in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Hormone Therapy
  • Physical Activity Across the Cancer Continuum
  • Exercise After Cancer Diagnosis: Time to Get Moving
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • ASCO: Vinegar Screening Significantly Reduces Cervical Cancer Mortality
  • ASCO: Sulforaphane in Prostate Cancer Found Worthy of Further Investigation
  • Study: Recurrent Heartburn Ups Risk for Throat Cancer
  • HER2-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation: The Current State of Our Knowledge
  • It’s Time for Clinicians to Reconsider Their Proscription Against the Use of Soyfoods by Breast Cancer Patients
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • ASCO: No Benefit From Avastin in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on EHR
Evidence on EHR
Guidelines on EHR
Patient Education on EHR
Clinical Trials on EHR
Practical Articles on EHR
Research and Reviews on EHR
All "EHR" results


CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy