CN Mobile Logo

Search form


Commentary (Komaki)—Anemia Treatment and the Radiation Oncologist: Optimizing Patient Outcomes

Commentary (Komaki)—Anemia Treatment and the Radiation Oncologist: Optimizing Patient Outcomes

This article reviews the recent literature documenting that anemia is one of the important prognostic factors among cancer patients. The authors suggest that anemia could be correlated with quality of life in addition to outcomes factors such as locoregional control and disease-free survival. They emphasize articles published between 1989 and 2001 that report the significance of anemia among patients treated with radiation therapy and describe the potential strategies for overcoming hypoxia by correcting the anemia.

Original Reports

The main criticism of this review is that the authors neglected the original articles describing the relationship between hemoglobin levels and local control rate in patients with carcinoma of the cervix and larynx.[1,2] Anemia associated with high risk of local failure was thought to be related to decreased oxygen supply to the tumor, which reduced radiosensitivity in patients with cervical or head and neck cancer. Therefore, the suggestion by Drs. Shasha and Harrison that "the prevalence and nature of anemia in the radiation oncology setting have been inadequately characterized" is not quite correct.

More recent articles have documented quality of life and prognostic factors associated with anemia among patients receiving chemotherapy, with or without other treatment modalities. I would like to remind oncologists to read the original study published by Dr. Raymond S. Bush and his colleagues in 2,803 patients with cervical cancer treated by radiation therapy at the Princess Margaret Hospital.[3] These investigators clearly noted that anemia was related to patient outcomes especially among those with more advanced disease (eg, stage IIB and III). In their randomized trial, intervention to increase hemoglobin levels prior to initiating radiation therapy produced markedly positive results.

Study patients had stage IIB or III carcinoma of the uterine cervix and hemoglobin levels between 10 and 12.5 g/dL. They were randomized to receive a red blood cell transfusion to raise their hemoglobin levels above 12.5 g/dL prior to standard pelvic radiation therapy vs observation. Patients given transfusions showed a significant increase in local control and disease-specific survival rates, compared to those who were observed without transfusion (P < .01).[3] However, this improvement was not significant among those with early-stage cervical cancer.


Over the next decade, major concerns developed regarding blood transfusions because of the transmission of hepatitis and HIV.[4] Moreover, whether the improvement in locoregional control would lead to improvement in outcome was also questioned. It was suggested that patients who presented with low hemoglobin levels may have a poor outcome despite subsequent improvement in hemoglobin levels via transfusion. These concerns became less important once recombinant human erythropoietin (Epogen, Procrit) with ferrous sulfate was shown to significantly increase hemoglobin levels (without a blood transfusion).[5] Over 400 anemic cancer patients were enrolled in prospective randomized clinical trials that compared subcutaneous erythropoietin to placebo. Some patients received chemotherapy concurrently. In one such trial, the quality of life of patients who received erythropoietin improved significantly, compared to patients given placebo.[6]


Loading comments...

By clicking Accept, you agree to become a member of the UBM Medica Community.