Numerous clinical studies suggest that the combination of the fluoropyridimine fluorouracil and radiation is a more effective treatment for many cancers, especially gastrointestinal tumors, than is either modality alone. Also, the combination of fluorouracil and radiation has greatly expanded the possibilities for organ-preserving treatments, for example, in patients with bladder cancer. Another fluoropyridimine, floxuridine, administered via the hepatic artery, has been used in combination with irradiation in the treatment of patients with intrahepatic cancers and may prolong survival in patients with unresectable hepatobiliary malignancies. The beneficial effects of combining fluoropyrimidines and radiation are thought to be due to radiosensitization. More studies are needed to clarify the mechanism(s) of radiosensitization so as to optimize regimens in which the fluoropyrimidines are used.
The fluoropyrimidines fluorouracil (5-FU) and floxuridine (5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine, FdUrd [FUDR]) are the most widely used radiation sensitizers in clinical practice. A large number of retrospective and prospective studies have suggested that the combination of fluorouracil and radiation is a more efficacious treatment for many malignancies (particularly gastrointestinal cancers) than either modality alone, and it has been hypothesized that the benefit from this combination is due to radiosensitization. In addition, the related nucleoside floxuridine has been used in combination with low-dose whole liver irradiation and with high-dose partial liver irradiation in the treatment of patients with intrahepatic malignancies.
In this article, we will briefly summarize laboratory studies aimed at determining the mechanism of fluoro- pyrimidine-mediated radiosensitization. (for more detailed reviews, readers are directed to references 1-3). We will then focus on clinical studies demonstrating the efficacy of the combination of radiation and fluoropyrimidines.
Fluorouracil and floxuridine are analogs of uracil and deoxyuridine, respectively (Figure 1). These compounds are metabolized to form fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate (FdUMP) (Figure 2), which is ultimately responsible for the DNA-directed effects of both drugs. Fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate, along with a folate cofactor, binds to and irreversibly inhibits thymidylate synthase (TS), the enzyme responsible for the conversion of deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP) to deoxythymidine monophosphate (dTMP). Thymidylate synthase inhibition leads to depletion of the product dTMP (and, ultimately, thymidine triphosphate) and to the accumulation of the substrate dUMP and other deoxyuridine nucleotides, particularly deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP). The resultant increase in the ratio of dUTP to deoxythymidine triphosphate (dTTP) results in misincorporation of dUTP into DNA. The importance of dUTP levels in cytotoxicity is suggested by the finding that human colon cancer cells transfected with the dUTPase gene, which express increased enzyme activity, are relatively protected from floxuridine cytotoxicity .
Prolonged TS inhibition leads ultimately to DNA fragmentation and cell death. Two patterns of DNA fragmentation have been noted. The first involves the production of a wide spectrum of fragments with molecular weights ranging from 50 Kb to 5 Mb, and is associated with a morphologic pattern consistent with necrosis. The second pattern results in discrete fragments weighing between 50 and 200 Kb. It resembles programmed cell death (ie, apoptosis), and suggests that the formation of oligosomal ladders is not an essential part of this phenomenon .
Whereas clinically achievable concentrations of floxuridine produce only DNA-mediated cytotoxicity, fluorouracil can also kill cells by RNA-dependent mechanisms. Flurouracil can be metabolized to fluorouracil monophosphate (FUMP) and ultimately to fluorouracil triphosphate (FUTP), which is incorporated into RNA in place of UTP. This misincorporation of FUTP can affect several critical aspects of messenger RNA (mRNA) function (including transcription, translation, and splicing).
The relative importance of DNA- vs RNA-mediated cytotoxicity varies considerably from one cell line to another. Leucovorin can act as a folate cofactor and increase the binding of fluorouracil to TS (see above), which tends to increase fluorouracil's DNA-directed actions.
Initial cell culture studies with fluorouracil suggested that sensitization occurred when cells were exposed to cytotoxic drug concentrations after irradiation . Other investigators have studied floxuridine, with its single mode of action rather than the more complex fluorouracil with its RNA- and DNA-directed actions. Floxuridine is a potent radiosensitizer of human colon cancer cells [6,7] (Figure 3). Floxuridine exposure prior to radiation produces significantly greater radiosensitization than treatment after irradiation.
Radiosensitization by floxuridine is related to TS inhibition, and is accompanied by both a decrease in DNA double-strand break  and sublethal damage repair . These findings probably also describe fluorouracil-mediated radiosensitization, since it appears to derive from the drug's DNA-directed effects . Also, leucovorin potentiates fluorouracil radiosensitization , presumably by increasing TS inhibition.
Various mechanisms have been proposed for fluoropyrimidine-mediated radiosensitization. These include:
- Alterations in the nucleotide pools;
- Redistribution of cells to a relatively radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle (ie, cells accumulate at the relatively radiosensitive G1/S boundary following exposure to floxuridine); and
- Fluorodeoxyuridine triphosphate incorporation into DNA.
Although each of these proposed mechanisms may play a role, none alone explains fluoropyrimidine-radiation interactions.10 Furthermore, recent evidence11 is inconsistent with the hypothesis that cytotoxicity and radio- sensitization are closely correlated [2,12]. We recently proposed that sensitization depends on the inappropriate progression of cells through the G1/S boundary and into S phase during exposure to fluoropyrimidines [10,11]. Research into the mechanisms of fluoropyrimidine-induced cytotoxicity and sensitization is driven by the need to develop methods of overcoming clinical drug resistance.
1. Byfield JE: Useful interactions between 5-fluorouracil and radiation in man: 5-fluorouracil as a radiosensitizer, in Hill BT and Bellamy AS (eds). Antitumor Drug-Radiation Interactions, pp 87-105. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1990.
2. Lawrence TS, Maybaum J: Fluoropyrimidines as radiation sensitizers. Semin Radiat Oncol 3:20-28, 1993.
3. McGinn CJ, Kinsella TJ: The clinical rationale for S-phase radiosensitization in human tumors. Curr Probl Cancer 17:275-321, 1993.
4. Canman CE, Radany EH, Parsels LA, et al: Induction of resistance to fluorodeoxyuridine cytotoxicity and DNA damage in human tumor cells by expression of Escherichia coli deoxyuridine triphosphatase. Cancer Res 54:2296-2298, 1994.
5. Canman CE, Tang HY, Normolle DP, et al: Variations in patterns of DNA damage induced in human colorectal tumor cells by 5-fluorodeoxyuridine: Implications for mechanisms of resistance and cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89:10474-10478, 1992.
6. Bruso CE, Shewach D, Lawrence TS: Fluorodeoxyuridine-induced radiosensitization and inhibition of DNA double strand break repair in human colon cancer cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19:1411-1417, 1990.
7. Miller EM, Kinsella TJ: Radiosensitization by fluorodeoxyuridine: Effects of thymidylate synthase inhibition and cell synchronization. Cancer Res 52:1687-1694, 1992.
8. Heimburger DK, Shewach DS, Lawrence TS: The effect of fluorodeoxyuridine on sublethal damage repair in human colon cancer cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:983-987, 1991.
9. Lawrence TS, Davis MA, Maybaum J: Dependence of 5-fluorouracil-mediated radiosensitization on DNA-directed effects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 29:519-523, 1994.
10. Lawrence TS, Maybaum J, Ensminger WD: Infusional fluoropyrimidines as radiation sensitizers: Clinical implications of laboratory findings. Infusional Chemotherapy (in press), 1995.
11. Davis MA, Tang HY, Maybaum J, et al: Dependence of fluorodeoxyuridine-mediated radiosensitization on S phase progression. Int J Radiat Biol (in press), 1995.
12. Byfield JE, Calabro-Jones P, Klisak LL, et al: Pharmacologic requirements for obtaining sensitization of human tumor cells in vitro to combined 5-fluorouracil or forafur and x-rays. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 8:1923-1933, 1982.
13. Thomas PR, Lindblad AS: Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in rectal carcinoma: A review of the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group experience. Radiother Oncol 13:245-252, 1988.
14. Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, et al: Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 324:709-715, 1991.
15. Anonymous: NIH consensus conference. Adjuvant therapy for patients with colon and rectal cancer. JAMA 264:1444-1450, 1990.
16. O'Connell MJ, Martenson JA, Wieand HS, et al: Improving adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer by combining protracted-infusion fluorouracil with radiation therapy after curative surgery. N Engl J Med 331:502-507, 1994.
17. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group: Radiation therapy and fluorouracil with or without semustine for the treatment of patients with surgical adjuvant adenocarcinoma of the rectum. J Clin Oncol 10:549-557, 1992.
18. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group: Therapy of locally unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: A randomized comparison of high-dose (6,000 rads) radiation alone, moderate-dose radiation (4,000 rads + 5-fluorouracil), and high-dose radiation + 5-fluorouracil. Cancer 48:120-125, 1981.
19. Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS: Pancreatic cancer: Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg 120:899-903, 1985.
20. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group: Further evidence of effective adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Cancer 59:2006-2010, 1987.
21. Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Griffin P, et al: Selective bladder preservation by combination treatment of invasive bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 329:1377-1382, 1993.
22. Rotman M, Macchia R, Silverstein M, et al: Treatment of advanced bladder carcinoma with irradiation and concomitant 5-fluorouracil infusion. Cancer 59:710-714, 1987.
23. Russell KJ, Boileau MA, Higano C, et al: Combined 5-fluorouracil and irradiation for transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19:693-699, 1990.
24. Boman BM, Moertel CG, O'Connell MJ, et al: Carcinoma of the anal canal: A clinical and pathologic study of 188 cases. Cancer 54:114-125, 1984.
25. Nigro ND, Seydel HG, Considine B, et al: Combined preoperative radiation and chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 51:1826-1829, 1983.
26. Michaelson RA, Magill GB, Quan SH, et al: Preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the management of anal epidermoid carcinoma. Cancer 51:390-395, 1983.
27. John MJ, Flam M, Lovalvo L, et al: Feasibility of non-surgical definitive management of anal canal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13:299-303, 1987.
28. Cummings BJ, Keane TJ, O'Sullivan B, et al: Epidermoid anal cancer: Treatment by radiation alone or by radiation and 5-fluorouracil with and without mitomycin C. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:1115-1125, 1991.
29. Herskovic A, Martz K, al-Sarraf M, et al: Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 15:655-662, 1988.
30. Forastiere AA, Orringer MB, Perez-Tamayo C, et al: Preoperative chemoradiation followed by transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus: Final report. J Clin Oncol 11:1118-1123, 1993.
30a. Urba S, Orringer M, Turrisi A, et al: A randomized trial comparing transhiatial esophagectomy (THE) to preoperative concurrent chemoradiation (CT/XRT) followed by esophagectomy in locoregional esophageal carcinoma (CA). Proc ASCO 14:199, 1995.
31. Coia LR, Engstrom PF, Paul A: Nonsurgical management of esophageal cancer: Report of a study of combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 5:1783-1790, 1987.
32. Herskovic A, Leichman L, Lattin P, et al: Chemo/radiation with and without surgery in the thoracic esophagus: The Wayne State experience. N Engl J Med 24:1593-1598, 1992
33. Ensminger WD, Rosowsky A, Raso V, et al: A clinical-pharmacological evaluation of hepatic arterial infusions of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine and 5-fluorouracil. Cancer Res 38:3784-3792, 1978.
34. Herbsman H, Hassan A, Gardner B, et al: Treatment of hepatic metastases with a combination of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and external radiotherapy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 147:13-17, 1978.
35. Robertson JM, Lawrence TS, Walker S, et al: The treatment of colorectal liver metastases with conformal radiation therapy and regional chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (in press), 1995.
36. Friedman M, Cassidy M, Levine M, et al: Combined modality therapy of hepatic metastasis: Northern California Oncology Group Pilot Study. Cancer 44:906-913, 1979.
37. Byfield JE, Barone RM, Frankel SS, et al: Treatment with combined intra-arterial 5-FUdR infusion and whole liver radiation for colon carcinoma metastatic to the liver: Preliminary results. Am J Clin Oncol 7:319-325, 1984.
38. Rotman M, Kuruvilla AM, Choi K, et al: Response of colorectal hepatic metastases to concomitant radiotherapy and intravenous infusion 5-fluorouracil. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 12:2179-2187, 1986.
39. Wiley AL, Wirtanen GW, Stephenson JA, et al: Combined hepatic artery 5-fluorouracil and irradiation of liver metastases: A randomized study. Cancer 64:1783-1789, 1989.
40. Ajlouni MI, Merrick HW, Skeel RT, et al: Concomitant radiation therapy and constant infusion FUdR for unresectable hepatic metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 13:532-535, 1990.
41. Robertson JM, Lawrence TS, Dworzanin LA, et al: Treatment of primary hepatobiliary cancers with conformal radiation therapy and regional chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 11:1286-1293, 1993.
42. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cance: The Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group. N Engl J Med 324:1685-1690, 1991.