CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Practice Management

Psychiatric Times.
 

Mass Murder and Psychiatry

By H. Steven Moffic, MD | December 17, 2012

Tragedy in NewtownThere has been increasing publicity about the imminent end of the world on December 21, 2012, as possibly posited in the Mayan Calendar. What we do know for sure, is that for all the young children and adults who were killed in Newtown, Connecticut, their world ended a week earlier, on December 14th.

As the play of the same name by Thornton Wilder, Newtown Is Our Town.

(MORE: Will 2013 Be a Lucky Year for Psychiatry?)

The perpetrator must be, in some way, everyman. We must be our brother's keepers. Any field that can contribute to the understanding and prevention of the increasing numbers of attempted and successful mass murders in the United States must work on this for the next weeks, months, and years. Psychiatry is surely one of these.

Diagnosis
Amidst all the initial speculation on the reasons for the tragedy, my wife noticed an e-mail from a psychiatrist that struck us as possibly revealing deeper issues, some perhaps indirectly relevant. The subject was “Autism not a Mental Illness.” Autism was one of the initial diagnoses associated with this killer. Beyond such premature diagnostic speculations, the e-mail was reacting to a CNN coverage in which a physician and a reporter discussed that autism may not be an illness, since NIMH was considering autism and other mental conditions as “neurogenerative.” Perhaps, the e-mailer suggested, if autism was not considered to be a mental illness, would that be better because then, if the murderer did not have a mental illness, mental illness could not be blamed for the mass murder.

This argument, though cumbersome, leads us to take a step back and take a bit of a detour. First of all, there are no mental illnesses, at least so far as the terminology goes for the DSM and ICD classifications of mental conditions. This is more important than mere semantics. These conditions are called disorders, not illnesses or diseases. The prime definition of disorders, in my Webster’s dictionary, is “confusion.”

However “disorder” is defined, it causes mental conditions to appear to be different from medical illnesses. It implies that clinicians other than psychiatrists can be expert in the diagnosis and treatment of those disorders. Indeed, that is one of the issues that I was concerned about in the March 2010 blog, “The DSM Process: More Questions Than Answers.” The cautionary statement as to who can make a diagnosis reads: “It can be used by a wide range of health and mental health professionals, including psychiatrists and other physicians, psychologists, social workers, nurses occupational and rehabilitation therapists and counselors.”

So much for the medical expertise of psychiatrists in making a diagnosis. As far as I know, that consideration will not change in the upcoming DSM-5.

This is a scenario that is more likely to lead to an inadequate diagnosis or missed diagnosis. Moreover, diagnosis, though necessary for reimbursement, research, and a general sense of what is wrong, should only be the necessary, but not sufficient, step in understanding an individual. Adequate time and analysis is required. As the bio-psycho-social model implies, we have to look far and wide to try to understand anyone. If indeed the perpetrator of the Newtown tragedy fell on the Autism spectrum, how often does a mass murderer have that diagnosis?

Guns
As so many have commented, the ease of obtaining automatic weapons can indeed contribute to mass destruction. If someone has untreated mental problems, the risk also increases. Adding guns and knowing how to use them, to someone with apparent mental problems, surely increases the odds of something bad happening.

Any positive reinforcement of gun use, outside of controlled situations such as hunting, may cause more unnecessary harm than benefit. Certainly, we have a lot of positive reinforcement and modeling of a gun culture in our Constitution, our seemingly endless war, and violence in the media. The more impersonal ways of relating on the internet may veer us more toward the social deficits and lack of empathy that is characteristic of the Autism spectrum.

Evil
I never used the term evil professionally or personally until I worked in prison part time at the end of my clinical career. For many of the inmates I saw, mental disorders, including substance abuse, seemed to play a significant role in their crimes. Gang involvement, where self-esteem and identity, was enhanced through group process, was another significant factor for many. On a rare occasion, neither a mental disorder, including antisocial personality disorder, nor gang behavior, seemed to be enough of an explanation.1 That is when I began to think more seriously of evil, as did many in the aftermath of this recent tragedy. The Governor of Connecticut claimed that “evil visited this community . . . .” Later he expanded that to mental illness dressed in evil. Perhaps that can be further expanded to mental illness dressed in evil and a holster.

Recommendations
Soon after the tragedy, one of the fathers of a child killed tearfully pleaded for society to learn from what happened in order to prevent future mass murders. Here’s what I think psychiatry can contribute:

• Autism, Asperger, and most every other mental condition worthy of our prime focus should be called diseases, not disorders
• All such diagnoses should be made or certified by a psychiatrist to qualify for medical insurance coverage
• Do not make public diagnoses of anyone not personally examined, per our Goldwater Rule
• This tragedy, following too many others, should spur further study of where criminal behavior ends and psychiatric disease begins, if indeed there is even such a line
• All psychiatrists should spend some clinical time in a correctional institution, either during residency or later for continuing education
• Find better ways to educate the public about the early signs of homicidal risk
• Advocate for a system of safe reporting of those felt to be at- risk for homicidal behavior
• Provide better resources in order to improve early treatment of homicidal ideation
• Convene a representative body of those injured by public violence and loved ones of those murdered, to work on a national Task Force to reduce mass murder
• Advocate for a special anniversary date or holiday, December 14th, to not only remember the Connecticut tragedy or others like it, but also as a way to monitor how we are doing as a nation and a profession in trying to prevent more such tragedies.

Reference
1. Moffic HS. Better Off in Prison; 2011. Psychiatric Times. http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/blog/couchincrisis/content/article/10168/1850954. Accessed December 17, 2012.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Lynn and Steve Moffic | January 04, 2013 12:19 PM EST

One more comment on the comments:

Arturo Mendoza-Lopez: Amen! And this is in our power to change.

by James OBrien | January 09, 2013 12:21 PM EST

Let's just ignore the fact that none of these proposed solutions would have actually done anything to stop this horrible crime. However, I am glad that the author finally had an epiphany about the existence of evil, something that four year olds with common sense seem to grasp better than adults under the influence of moral relativism.

Let's deal with these proposals point by point. These were clearly not thought out at all.

1. Autism, Asperger, and most every other mental condition worthy of our prime focus should be called diseases, not disorders.

Lanza's immediate motivation was fear of commitment and competing for the love of his mother. We have no information that he was particularly concerned nor motivated by DSM5 epistemological nor phenomenological debates over the definition of disease vs. disorder. Moreover, we have no information that Asperger's had anything to do with extreme violence. If his mother had designs on having him civilly committed, then it is likely that the diagnosis was actually more serious. I do not like the implication that Asperger's explains this crime, because at this point there is no evidence of that, and in general Asperger's patients are not known to be particularly violent.

2.All such diagnoses should be made or certified by a psychiatrist to qualify for medical insurance coverage

Lack of insurance coverage has nothing to do with this situation. His parents were wealthy and his mother was trying to get him institutionalized. If there is any "coverage"issue, it is the unreasonable burdens associated with involuntary commitment. Bringing his issue up in the context of this news story smack of ghoulish exploitation and lobbying. Moreover, James Holmes of the Aurora mass murder did receive treatment and still went ahead with his terrible deeds.

3. Do not make public diagnoses of anyone not personally examined, per our Goldwater Rule

This is a good idea that the author should have heeded by not assuming that he has Asperger's or that this had anything to do with the murders.

4. This tragedy, following too many others, should spur further study of where criminal behavior ends and psychiatric disease begins, if indeed there is even such a line.

This idea is predicated on the idea that "normal" human behavior is "good" and fails to take into account the natural state of man as an aggressive species. I can understand why the author took so long to get a grasp on evil. This pursuit is no especially useful anyway. There is no evidence that Hitler was legally mentally ill, and it pure fantasy that psychiatry could have done what it took millions of Allied troops to accomplish.

5.All psychiatrists should spend some clinical time in a correctional institution, either during residency or later for continuing education.

Are you really advocating mandatory prison service for CME certification? Again, there is no evidence that this would have done anything to stop Lanza and this is completely tangential to the issue at hand.

6. Find better ways to educate the public about the early signs of homicidal risk.

Apparently the staff at the school already was concerned as was his mother but they were unable to have him civilly committed. Notice that the author said nothing about overly permissive involuntary commitment laws that have been a disaster for 50 years.

7. Advocate for a system of safe reporting of those felt to be at- risk for homicidal behavior

This sounds perilously close to a Soviet style snitch program and is a clear violation of civil liberties.

8. Provide better resources in order to improve early treatment of homicidal ideation.

Again, Holmes had treatment and this did not stop him. Many people with homicidal ideation will not admit it and when they do, you are lucky to be able to detain them in most states for more than 72 hours.

9. Convene a representative body of those injured by public violence and loved ones of those murdered, to work on a national Task Force to reduce mass murder.

Ah, the task force, the bureaucratic answer to all problems. The same kind of task forces that made DSM5 a mess. Apparently Holmes was reported to a danger assessment team and nothing happened. How exactly would this task force have stopped any of the recent mass murders?

10. Advocate for a special anniversary date or holiday, December 14th, to not only remember the Connecticut tragedy or others like it, but also as a way to monitor how we are doing as a nation and a profession in trying to prevent more such tragedies.

This reminds me of the maudlin Princes Diana days of mourning in Great Britain. How about letting the people who were affected by the tragedy mourn privately with dignity instead of instigating a public spectacle, just in time to put a permanent downer on the holidays? If this is the trend, are we going to have national days of mourning for each and every mass murder? If not, why not? Are those victims less deserving? How far do we go back? The Homestead Steel Strike of 1892? The Boston Massacre?

Ten suggestions, ten completely irrelevant, ineffective, expensive failed prescriptions. Yet there not a word about such obvious issues as obviously failed family dynamics. We do have evidence that the mother enabled his lack of maturity and allowed unacceptable behavior in her home by allowing him to take over two rooms while remaining idle. She obviously lacked common sense by not getting rid of weapons in a situation in which she could be overpowered by a younger unstable male. There are reports that the courts were concerned about parenting skills at the time of their divorce. We know that the father was not involved in his obviously troubled son's life (though in his defense he simply may have given up in frustration at the obvious pathological dynamic between mother and son). We know that the murderer (notice that I do not use the nonjudgmental term "gunman" or "suspect" as the media do) had warped Oedpial issues, feeling that his mother loved the school more than him, and he took out the ultimate Oedipal revenge. I think it is pretty obvious at this point that the writings of Sigmund Freud and psychoanalysis in general are more explanatory than any abstruse debate about Asperger's and its DSM5 classification.

As far as the gun debate, I have little faith that gun control would be any more effective than the War on Drugs or Prohibition and will probably make things worse. Chicago has strict gun control and had over 500 murders last year. Whatever feelings the Sandy Hook administrators had on this issue, I guarantee you at their moment of impending doom, they all wish they had an armed off duty cop or ex-IDF officer in the vicinity. Psychiatrists should be loathe to focus on tools and the first to focus on pathological psychodynamic issues instead.

James O'Brien, M.D.
Forensic Psychiatry
Mira Loma, CA

by Lynn and Steve Moffic | January 10, 2013 11:11 AM EST

Thank you, Dr. O'Brien, for taking the time to respond so specifically to what you perceived I was saying. It's sort of a blog on its own, especially since I think I didn't make some of my points clear enough to you. First, a general clarification and then to respond to your specifics. For better or worse, I indeed used this tragedy to try to make some general points about the problems in psychiatry. There was nothing there about what diagnosis I thought the perpetrator might have. I think everything we know about him is right now peacemeal, and inadequate to make any specific conclusions. Concerning your specifics:

1. I was trying to say the opposite of what you imply I said about Asperger's, so I agree with you.
2. I agree that insurance had nothing to do with this situation, since by all accounts the family could have even self-paid. As to James Holmes, the information available is that his treatment was incomplete and hospitalization was likely necessary.
3. I strongly stated that I try to abide by the Goldwater Rule and so did not imply any diagnosis. From the little I know about Mr. Lanza's history, to me it is consistant with something other or more than Asperger's, but I am only saying this in response to your comment.
4. I don't think Hitler was ever seen by a psychiatrist; it sure would have been interesting to see what a child psychiatrist would have done if he was seen by one during childhood. There is also a reference at the end that I have been writing about evil for some time now, and actually won a national healthcare journalist's award for doing so.
5. I think some brief time working or observing in a correctional institution, either during residency or for CME, would round out the education of any psychiatrist, and also confront most with the question of "evil".
6. I discussed the need for more involuntary treatment in a prior blog ,"Is It Time for Re-Institutionalization?"(April 20, 2012), so please review that to see that I agree with you.
7. Why is this Soviet-style? Don't we have a similar responsibility for reporting for other dangerous behavior, ranging from child abuse to HIV, without any Soviet-like repercussions?
8. Again, I was not commenting on specific cases, just to improve early treatment anywhere possible. It sure seemed to me working in prison that many of the inmates (and, of course, their victimes) could have benefitted from early treatment instead of later incarceration.
9. The task force for DSM did not include the public or politicians and, in that way, was filled with conflict-of-interest, including a potential financial windfall for the APA. Not a good comparison.
10.Just pick a date. Don't we have something similar now for Memorial Day, except this is for those who have been killed in war. What about those innocently killed in peacetime in our society?

Finally, I would be very cautious about psychodynamic speculations at this time, although I was trained that way and still use that perspective. Freud called doing that "wild analysis". There is absolutely no evidence of a disastrous Oedipal conflict here, even though the family situation could easily lead to such speculation. Our field has been oh-so-wrong to blame mothers in the past, ranging from schizophrenogenic mothers to the "cold" mothers causing Autism. I, for one, was quite saddened that bells were generally not rang for the perpetrator's mother. The bell also had tolled for her before - and when - she was killed.

by James OBrien | January 10, 2013 11:56 AM EST

I have no trouble blaming the mother's actions and calling his motives Oepidal, which I am broadly defining as homicidal feelings toward a competing maternal love interest (if not necessarily the literal father). We know that this twenty year old man was motivated to mass murder because he feared his mother in his eyes loved the people at the school more than himself. This at an age where he should have been dating and been reasonably independent. The mother is the second most culpable party here. She chose to turn her spacious and expensive home into the Bates Motel, instead of helping her son become a man. Not getting the weapons out of the house while she had a relative living with her as she was trying to have him committed for psychiatric illness was completely reckless and irresponsible. I have absolutely no problem judging the mother's parenting skills, weapons safety procedures, common sense and finding them all deficient. The children and the adults at the school were completely innocent/blameless, she was not, and clearly enabled this tragedy.

We are all judgmental, some of us just choose to admit it. There needs to be more dialogue in this society about how families are screwing up their children and less talk about public funding and government policy. Something "had to be done" after 9-11. What we got was the TSA, the NSA, the Patriot Act and the Iraq War. These problems need to be thought through before we make sweeping changes that are likely to make things worse. Histrionic policy is histrionic acting out and almost always backfires.

by Lynn and Steve Moffic | January 10, 2013 1:37 PM EST

Thanks for your follow-up response, Dr. O'Brien. So I can understand better where you are drawing your conclusions, can you provide us the sources for "We know that . . .".
Although I am quite loathe to blame the mother here without detailed knowledge of the family history, and after all she is a victim as well and can't give her side of the story, I am all for improved parenting. Do you have suggestions of how this can be improved?
And, wouldn't it be helpful to hear the father's side of the story (unless I missed it)?

Steve

Article Comment Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Previous Next


Also by Dr Moffic

Once a Psychiatrist, Always a Psychiatrist?

Mental Bootcamp: Today Is the First Day of Your Retirement!

How to End a Psychiatric Epidemic: The Redemption of Psychiatry

Psychism: Defining Discrimination of Psychiatry

Psychiatric Eulogies for Psychiatrists Who Inspired

Mass Murder and Psychiatry

The Psychology of Guns: 12 Steps Toward More Safety

Will 2013 Be a Lucky Year for Psychiatry?






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • A 49-Year-Old Woman Develops Thickened and Bound-Down Skin
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Therapy Innovations
  • A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Conflicts of Interest in Medicine: What About Ties to Payers?
  • Planning Treatment for Women With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Practice Management
Evidence on Practice Management
Guidelines on Practice Management
Patient Education on Practice Management
Clinical Trials on Practice Management
Practical Articles on Practice Management
Research and Reviews on Practice Management
All "Practice Management" results

CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy