CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Practice Management

 

FDA reform legislation nears passage

October 15, 1997

The House of Representatives last week passed its version of legislation that would reform the Food and Drug Administration, setting the stage for what would be the biggest overhaul of the agency in years. The legislation is intended to speed up the review of medical drugs and devices, and includes provisions for allowing third parties to review 510(k) applications of low- and medium-risk devices.

The House acted on its version of FDA reform on Oct. 7, passing the bill by a wide margin. The Senate passed its own legislation Sept. 24, and the bills will go to conference committee later this month to iron out differences before being sent to President Clinton for his signature.

Major provisions in the legislation include an expansion of the FDA's third-party device review pilot program, as well as a renewal of the pharmaceutical user fees that have allowed the agency to hire hundreds of additional employees to speed up drug reviews. Another provision in the Senate bill would remove the FDA's authority to regulate radioisotopes produced in cyclotrons for PET imaging, which has been a point of contention between PET advocates and the FDA. Differences between the bills include provisions concerning the FDA's ability to regulate devices for uses other than those intended by the manufacturer.

As FDA reform neared passage, the agency's Center for Devices and Radiological Health released data that show it has improved its review turnaround times. During the 1997 fiscal year, CDRH took an average of 97 days to review 510(k) submissions, according to the agency. That represents an improvement over the average time of 110 days reported last year and 184 days during the 1994 fiscal year.

In the first three quarters of this fiscal year, 98% of 510(k) submissions received an initial review decision in 90 days or less, compared with 93% last year and 68% for the 1994 fiscal year. The agency credited management initiatives, including improved communication with manufacturers during the planning of clinical studies, for the sharp reduction of review times.

The CDRH has also eliminated its backlog for premarket approval applications (PMAs). In addition, CDRH approved 48 PMAs during the fiscal year. In fiscal year 1996, it approved 43 applications.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Skin Lesions
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
  • Genomics Studies Identify Testicular Cancer Risk Variants
  • Lower Back Pain in an Elderly Man With a History of Localized Prostate Cancer
  • FDA Approves Erlotinib (Tarceva) as First-Line Lung Cancer Therapy for Certain Patients
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Conflicts of Interest in Medicine: What About Ties to Payers?
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Practice Management
Evidence on Practice Management
Guidelines on Practice Management
Patient Education on Practice Management
Clinical Trials on Practice Management
Practical Articles on Practice Management
Research and Reviews on Practice Management
All "Practice Management" results

CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy