CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Practice Management

 

Look Out for CMS’s Place of Service Code Changes

By Richard Woodcock, MD | October 31, 2012

The presidential election is center stage at the moment, and rightly so. For physicians, the outcome of that election may have profound implications for how our business is conducted, how the system we’ll be working in may change, and how and how much we’ll all be paid.

Just because there’s a big election with policy implications in the offing doesn’t mean there aren’t changes afoot in small policies and administration. And some of those may have as big an impact or bigger in the short term.

(MORE: Lessons for Radiology from the Service Industry)

CMS has become ever more active in recent months, apparently in an effort to constrain costs however it can. Investigations for fraud are in the news regularly, and RACs are increasingly evident in the workplace, in no small part evaluating independent testing facilities for compliance. Another recent policy change was announced that may affect radiology outpatient billing and potentially put radiologists at risk from CMS as well. Starting in April of 2013, CMS says it will strictly require place of service (POS) codes for outpatient services to match the POS for the technical component of the service, including for imaging.

If the technical component is performed in what they call an outpatient hospital, both the technical and professional components have to be billed with that outpatient hospital POS, regardless of where the study is read. That means that if you are in a hospital-based or affiliated practice, and you are reading for an outpatient facility of the hospital, you need to know what place of service code they are using.

Just another billing office compliance issue, you might say? Not so fast. If you bill your interpretation with a non-facility POS code (such as “office”), it means a much higher reimbursement from CMS than that which is allowed for the professional component associated with an outpatient hospital service. So for practices that do a large volume of reading for outpatient hospital-based facilities — and aren’t in compliance with the correct POS — you can expect a big hit to the bottom line from your Medicare payments in 2013.

Keep a close eye on the election, but don’t forget that CMS administration is not waiting on the results to make or amend its policies, to trim payments to us.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

More from Richard Woodcock, MD

Dispelling Misperceptions in Radiology

Know Your Role as Supervising Physician for Imaging Services

Consider the Pros and Cons of Patient Empowerment

Set Expectations Through Communication

Be Smart About Electronic Communications

Look Out for CMS’s Place of Service Code Changes

Radiologists Should Act on Appropriateness Decisions

Identifying the Right Equipment for the Imaging Study

Lessons for Radiology from the Service Industry






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Skin Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Practice Management
Evidence on Practice Management
Guidelines on Practice Management
Patient Education on Practice Management
Clinical Trials on Practice Management
Practical Articles on Practice Management
Research and Reviews on Practice Management
All "Practice Management" results

CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy