CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Practice Management

 

Tomosynthesis Boosts Accuracy in Breast Screening

By Marijke Vroomen Durning, RN | November 20, 2012

Three-dimensional imaging with breast tomosynthesis increases diagnostic accuracy and reduces false positive recall rates, say researchers in a study in the journal Radiology.

“The beauty of tomosynthesis is that it addresses two major concerns with screening mammography: missed cancers and false positive rates,” lead researcher Elizabeth A. Rafferty, MD, said in a press release. Rafferty is the director of Breast Imaging at the Avon Comprehensive Breast Center at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. According to the National Cancer Institute, up to 30 percent of breast cancers are missed by traditional screening mammography and between 8 and 10 percent of women receive false positive results, which then requires them to go for further testing.

(MORE: Mammo Plus Tomo Increases Breast Cancer Detection Rate)

Researchers recruited 1,192 women to undergo standard digital mammogram followed by breast tomosynthesis. A total of 997 women, including 780 who were screening cases and 217 who needed pre-biopsy breast imaging, had complete data sets. Total radiation dose for the combined procedure was less than 3 milligray, which is the FDA limit for a single mammogram.
Once images were obtained, 27 radiologists participated in two reader studies, 312 (12 radiologists) and 310 cases (15 radiologists), respectively. Forty-eight cancers were detected in the first group, 51 in the second.

The tomosynthesis findings resulted in an increased diagnostic accuracy for all radiologists. Diagnostic sensitivity of the combined exam was increased by 10.7 percent among radiologists in the first study and 16 percent in the second.

False positive recall rates also decreased significantly. Absolute recall rates dropped by 38.6 percent in study one and 17.1 percent in study two.

“In the clinical setting, we would expect that type of reduction in recall rate to translate into a substantial number of unnecessary diagnostic tests being avoided,” said Rafferty.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

Related Articles

Pondering Adoption of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Cuts Recall Rate

Reimbursement Issues Plague Tomosynthesis Adoption

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Doses Comparable to Mammography

Practices Adjust Workflow, IT for Tomosynthesis Adoption

Podcast: Breast Tomosynthesis — One Practice's Experience

Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Mammo Improves Accuracy

Tomosynthesis Boosts Accuracy in Breast Screening

Breast Tomosynthesis in Practice

Mammo Plus Tomo Increases Breast Cancer Detection Rate






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Skin Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
  • Staying Fit Could Ward Off Lung and Colorectal Cancer for Middle-Age Men
  • Obesity Impairs Efficacy of L-Asparaginase in Leukemia Treatment
  • New AUA Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Screening
  • 50 Shades of Pink—And Why It Helps to Know the Difference
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Patient Quality of Life Endpoints in Oncology Trials, Part II
  • Who's Coding Whom?
  • “How Do I Say This Nicely? Your Oncologist Wasn't Following Guidelines”
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • ONS: Safe Handling of Chemotherapy
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Practice Management
Evidence on Practice Management
Guidelines on Practice Management
Patient Education on Practice Management
Clinical Trials on Practice Management
Practical Articles on Practice Management
Research and Reviews on Practice Management
All "Practice Management" results

CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy