CancerNetwork Members: Login | Register
Become a fan on  Facebook  Add us on  Google Plus Follow us on  Twitter Join us on LinkedIn Sign up for our Newsletters Subscribe to our RSS Feed

 

CancerNetwork SearchMedica Medline Drugs

Powered by SearchMedica

 
PUBLICATIONS
NEWS
PODCASTS
TOPICS
BLOGS
NURSES
PATIENTS
JOBS
CONFERENCES
CME
SUPPLEMENTS
 

Home » Practice Management

Physicians Practice.
 

Planning for ICD-10 Conversion

The path to ICD-10 conversion can seem daunting, but don't let that stop you from building a plan now.

By Lucien W. Roberts | January 31, 2012

For medical practices, the path to ICD-10 conversion can seem like climbing to the other side of a very high mountain. While CMS has plied practices with incentives to make the climb, there are also penalties (starting this year) for not meeting conversion milestones. Regardless of your practice objectives, this is a government-mandated program that is unavoidable. Done well, ICD-10 will be time-consuming and costly. Done wrong, ICD-10 could cost your practice much more than it gains in financial incentives for programs like meaningful use, PQRS, and e-prescribing.

However you feel about converting to ICD-10, the deadline is looming. It's time to start thinking about drawing up your plan of action. Here are some statistics to consider:

(MORE: ICD-10: Next Steps for Physicians' Practices)

• American Association of Professional Coders (AAPC) expects ICD-10 will increase your documentation time by 15 percent.

• Medical Group Management Association estimates it will cost $27,000 to $29,000 per doctor to move to ICD-10.

• Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) collected $934.9 million in FY 2011, a scary increase over the scant $92.3 million they collected in FY 2010. For their efforts, the RACs earned $97.3 million for FY 2011 — think they see ICD-10 as a gold mine? I do.

For the sake of this article, let's assume ICD-10 does arrive on schedule on October 1, 2013. Though I would love to digress — Do we really need four codes for flatulence? — I will instead offer several things you can do to begin your journey toward successful ICD-10 conversion.

1. Pace yourself and your practice.

ICD-10 preparation is a marathon and not a sprint, best digested in smaller bites. We recommend setting incremental goals/tasks (like those suggested below) along a 6-12 month timeline.

2. Take advantage of ICD-10 training programs.

If you have a certified professional coder in your office, have him go through ICD-10 training and certification. Practice management consultant Sue A. Irwin astutely blogged on Physicians Practice's Practice Notes that coders and billers will need to understand anatomy and physiology at a more detailed level.

3. Run a report of your 50 most-frequently used ICD-9 codes.

If this list encompasses less than 80 percent of your claims, expand the list until you hit 80 percent. Now, use a tool such as the AAPC's ICD-10 code translator to determine how many ICD-10 codes are needed to replace your ICD-9 codes. These codes should be your focus. You and your clinical, coding, and billing staff will use these codes as your roadmap; the charge to each of you will be to understand the granularity of the expanded code set.

• An alternative to running the top 50 report would be to use the ICD-9 codes on the back of your face sheet/encounter form. Such an endeavor may be too much to handle initially; for instance, our pediatrician's encounter form contains 273 ICD-9 codes.

• Start with a manageable number (10 codes to 15 codes per week) and expand your effort rather than get overwhelmed by the magnitude of the project.

• You may choose to offer a weekly or biweekly lunch-and-learn in which you educate your staff on anatomy and physiology nuances.

4. Put yourself in the shoes of an ICD code.

Walk through your office. Look at where ICD codes are used and where incremental detail/documentation will be needed.

• You will discover that the ICD transition impacts many more facets of your operations than the 5010 transition or the HIPAA Privacy implementation of 2003. From authorizations to billing, and your documentation to referrals, many processes will be impacted.

• You will want to assess the impact of the ICD transition in each area.

5. Develop a plan of action.

Each affected area should develop a game plan for adjusting work flows, revising forms, etc. It then is helpful to aggregate these plans and look at how each process flows. Make sure that the respective game plans dovetail each other.

6. Communicate/coordinate with EHR vendors.

Some EHR/practice management system vendors may think it's a bit early to discuss their ICD-10 transition plans; I disagree. Your efforts will be for naught if your vendor is not on the same page.

• Ask your vendor for help in understanding any ICD-10-related changes to workflows, and reconcile these changes to your staff's game plans.

• Get something from them in writing with regard to their transition timelines and their plans to educate and test.

• Several vendors use robust clinical databases such as Medcin or SnoMed that should help you with the more granular documentation ICD-10 will require of you.

The other side of the mountain is less than two years away. ICD-10 is the latest in a progression of unfunded mandates, but unlike most of its successors, ICD-10 cannot be bluffed or winged. Nor, I believe, can it be implemented overnight. The time you invest in the next two years to prepare yourself and your staff for the conversion will, looking back in 2014 and beyond, appear to be one of the smartest things you may have ever done.

Lucien W. Roberts, III, MHA, FACMPE, is vice president of Pulse Systems, Inc., and a former practice administrator. For the past 20 years, he has worked in and consulted with physician practices in areas such as compliance, physician compensation, negotiations, strategic planning, and billing/collections. He can be reached at lroberts@pulseinc.com.

 

Join the Conversation

Want to join the conversation? If you're a healthcare professional, we'd like to hear your comments. Just sign in or register today to become part of our growing, online community.

  • Oldest First
  • Newest First

by Gary Mohr | April 12, 2012 10:10 AM EDT

It's time to just say NO to an out of control federal government. Between ANSI 5010, CLIA, HIPAA, Medicare documentation requirements, maintenance of certification and conversion to ICD-10, I have no time to practice medicine and no time for a family life.
I will not switch to ICD-10 which is not just an unfunded mandate or a cost of doing business. It is a targeted program to drive physicians from private practice. Solo docs are harder to control than a group of docs in an ACO. Don't let them destroy our liberty.
Remember why you went into medicine in the first place: To take care of people.
Not websites and reams of paperwork.

by Dale Mortimer, M.D. | February 02, 2012 10:55 AM EST

2/2/2012 Conversion to ICD-10 completed. Thanks for help with conversion table! Total time to convert: 30 minutes. Cost to me: zero dollars.
Dale Mortimer, M.D.
Psychiatrist
Vancouver, WA

by Lynne Spryszak | January 31, 2012 2:06 PM EST

I would just like to mention that the conversion from ICD-9 to ICD-10-CM/PCS was announced in January of 2009. This provided a 4-year head start for physicians and practices to plan for and adapt to the conversion. Those who have deferred any implementation processes until now have no one to blame but themselves.

ICD-10 has been used for reporting mortality data in the United States since 1999. The United Kingdom, among other developed nations, has been using ICD-10 since the 1990's. Why does this transition pose such a problem for providers in the United States? IS there something different about the diagnoses treated in the United States?

Physician documentation should not take more time than it does now, unless current documentation patterns reflect the use of incomplete diagnostic statements or missing information. Many physicians have fallen into the bad habit of selecting "unspecified"or "NOS" codes to describe their patients' diagnoses, when more specific codes have already been available for years. A classic example is ICD-9 diagnosis code 250.00. Most physicians are surprised to learn that this code represents a patient with uncomplicated diabetes (a stable diabetic without any related problems) - and yet in most practices this code is selected more frequently than the specific diabetic codes already available. Even in ICD-9 there are codes to report diagnoses with greater specificity, so why are physicians so upset about ICD-10?

Most physicians do not do their own coding and billing - and should not - unless they have been trained in the application of coding rules and guidelines. It is not necessary for physicians to learn all the ins-and-outs of coding if they would only apply a few simple guidelines when they are documenting care:

1) Is the condition acute, chronic or both? Define the nature of the condition.
2) Document the "due to": is the patient's condition due to an underlying condition or disorder? If it is, say so: "Chronic gastric ulcer with acute bleeding"
3) Is the condition a complication of something (previous procedure, a device, over/underdosing of medication), for example? Document the cause-effect in the notes so that the Coder can select the most specific code.
4) Coders cannot "assume" anything. If you don't document it, then it can't be coded. From a reporting and reimbursement standpoint, this means that your patient doesn't have it. It's pretty hard to substantiate a higher-level E/M visit reported with non-specific diagnoses codes - this is what auditors are trained to hone in on. If your records show that codes are being assigned based on anything BUT explicit physician documentation, you are setting yourself up for future problems.

More from Sue A. Irwin:

When Your Medical Billing Vendor Changes Ownership

The Right People in the Right Roles Is Key to Your Medical Practice

Improving Business Processes at Your Medical Practice

Today's Medical Practice Cash Flow Tied to Internet

10 Tips to Differentiate Your Medical Practice from the Others

Debate over ICD-10 Future Leaves Medical Practices Struggling in Present

Planning for ICD-10 Conversion

Treat Your Patients Like Customers, or Lose Them

Two Steps to Simplify ICD-10 Transition at Your Medical Practice

New Year Comes with New Challenges in Healthcare Reimbursement

Physician Credentialing: Worth Getting Right to Get Paid

Feds Set Fraud Watch List for Physicians in 2012

It’s Time to Trust Your Trusted Healthcare Vendors, Advisors

Seven Reasons to Be Very Nervous About Your Cash Flow

Do What You Do Best, Outsource the Rest

Don't Let 30 Percent of Your Practice Income Get Away (Part II)

Don't Let 30 Percent of Your Practice Income Get Away (Part I)

Read more articles on preparing for ICD-10

Preparing Your Medical Practice for ICD-10

Planning for ICD-10 Conversion

ICD-10: Why You Shouldn't Wait

Preparing for the ICD-10 Transition

How Your Medical Practice Can Avoid ICD-10 Pitfalls

ICD-10: Next Steps for Physicians' Practices






 
TOPIC INDEX

Cancer Types

 
  • Breast
  • Breast (HER2+)
  • Breast (Triple-Negative)
  • CML
  • Colorectal
  • Gastrointestinal
  • GIST
  • Genitourinary
  • Gynecologic
  • Head & Neck
  • Hematology
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Lung
  • Lymphoma
  • Melanoma
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Ovarian
  • Prostate
  • Sarcoma

Supportive Care

More Topics

  • Bone Metastases
  • End-of-Life Care
  • Palliative Care
  • Ethics in Oncology
  • Practice Management
  • Practice & Policy


All Topics 


 
MOST POPULAR
  • Most Popular
  • Most Emailed
  • Most Recent
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Slide Show: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • A 49-Year-Old Woman Develops Thickened and Bound-Down Skin
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated With Targeted Therapies
  • Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Update on Treatment
  • Colorectal Lesions
  • ONS: Understanding Spirituality and How It Can Be Used to Help Patients
  • Breast Cancer Screening, Risk, and Options for High-Risk Women
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Therapy Innovations
  • A 52-Year-Old Man Presents With an Erythematous Lesion
  • Bone Metastases
  • Palliative Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bone Metastases Improves Quality of Life
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter
 
COMMENTS
  • Most Commented
  • Most Recent
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
  • Financial Toxicity, Part II: How Can We Help With the Burden of Treatment-Related Costs?
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Conflicts of Interest in Medicine: What About Ties to Payers?
  • Planning Treatment for Women With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
  • Rising PSA Level in a 46-Year-Old Man
  • Preventing Exposure to Hazardous Drugs
  • Cancer Metabolism as a Therapeutic Target
  • Study: Cholesterol Drugs Reduced Risk of Prostate Cancer Death
  • “This Is My Last Day on Earth”
Click here to subscribe to our newsletter


 
SearchMedica Search Result

Find peer-reviewed literature and websites for practicing medical professionals

CME on Practice Management
Evidence on Practice Management
Guidelines on Practice Management
Patient Education on Practice Management
Clinical Trials on Practice Management
Practical Articles on Practice Management
Research and Reviews on Practice Management
All "Practice Management" results

CancerNetwork on Facebook

CancerNetwork | ConsultantLive | Diagnostic Imaging | Musculoskeletal Network | OBGYN.net | PediatricsConsultantLive |
Physicians Practice | Psychiatric Times | SearchMedica | Medical Resources

© 1996 - 2013 UBM Medica LLC, a UBM company
Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Advertising Information - Editorial Policy Statement - UBM Medica Network Privacy Policy